Teams

CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $20

CDTA Fall Combo · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.62 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesLaura Purcell / Katherine Wood vs Jean Soh / Laura Knapp7-5, 5-4
L#2 DoublesSheila Spade / Deirdre Egan vs Marjorie Baltazar / Angela Hanson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSavanna Rhodes / Sarah W Johnson vs Sarah Blankenbaker / Irene Salerno4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMarie Dillon / Savanna Rhodes vs Suzanne Beu / Laurie Schachman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAgnieszka Fijol / Sheila Spade vs Joanne Lund / Hilary Hoye1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEla Lewis / Catherine Brink vs Katie Burnside / Kelly Matthews-Pluta6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Cecilia Lauterbach vs Maureen Porter / Jackie Smith3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Anglin Weathers / Tanja Boskovic vs Sara Olson / Nancy Cushing6-7, 3-5
L#3 DoublesLaura Purcell / Ryoko Howell vs Jennifer Peterson / Sue Dedmond6-7, 4-5
W#1 DoublesTina Dandridge / Angela Anglin Weathers vs Karen Kooperman / Kelly Golden6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKitty Swanson / Agnieszka Fijol vs Jaclyn Levin / Marina Minkina6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Brink / Ela Lewis vs Linda Anderson / Judy Caruso7-5, 7-6
W#1 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Cecilia Lauterbach vs Julie Colhoun / Yarina Birnbaum7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSheila Spade / Deirdre Egan vs Patricia Nick / Karen Proesel3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Wood / Agnieszka Fijol vs Christine Shepherd / Paula McKendry7-5, 5-2
L#1 DoublesErica Donofrio / Kitty Swanson vs Perry Mimms / Sophia Koliatsis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCate Brodner / Emily Lund vs Susan Kalina / Narissa Breger6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah W Johnson / Miyuki Landt vs Heather Vishnubhakat / Diane Egan6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $1760171391
2CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $204213512114
3CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25429921164
4CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22339921151
5CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $202461224185
6CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam McKendry Sun 4 $221551327174
7CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $251541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Hoda Elshakankery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Angela Anglin Weathers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ela Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Kitty Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Tanja Boskovic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Erica Donofrio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Agnieszka Fijol
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Sheila Spade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Cate Brodner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine Brink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deirdre Egan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Marie Dillon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Tina Dandridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Vina Maniquis
published 3.5
3.20
Miyuki Landt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Elizabeth Cassier
published 3.5
3.04
Cecilia Lauterbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Sarah W Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Ryoko Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Karen Salter
published
Katherine Wood
published
Savanna Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanja Boskovic + Emily Lund7262% games+13.1% vs expected
Agnieszka Fijol + Emily Lund7065% games+13.1% vs expected
Erica Donofrio + Emily Lund15462% games+7.6% vs expected
Karen Salter + Angela Anglin Weathers4551% games+3.6% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Sarah W Johnson211153% games+1.3% vs expected
Laura Purcell + Angela Anglin Weathers4749% games−0.3% vs expected
Vina Maniquis + Emily Lund13651% games−2.0% vs expected
Ryoko Howell + Cecilia Lauterbach12758% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hoda Elshakankery
216W–111L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
4
Angela Anglin Weathers
130W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Ela Lewis
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Kitty Swanson
46W–60L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 1 line in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Tanja Boskovic
194W–136L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Erica Donofrio
51W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Agnieszka Fijol
130W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Sheila Spade
38W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cate Brodner
96W–153L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Catherine Brink
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Deirdre Egan
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marie Dillon
49W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Tina Dandridge
108W–87L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Vina Maniquis
100W–105L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Miyuki Landt
31W–61L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Elizabeth Cassier
71W–139L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Cecilia Lauterbach
83W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.04
Sarah W Johnson
91W–135L career · 2 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Ryoko Howell
82W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Karen Salter
46W–58L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Wood
46W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Savanna Rhodes
21W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.