Teams

CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22

CDTA Fall Combo · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.80 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesJill Siegel / Megan Crisham vs Julie Colhoun / Tina Kayne4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSvetlana Kanev / Laura Knapp vs Elizabeth Berry / Paula McKendry6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Dimitrina Schoyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesJean Soh / Laura Knapp vs Laura Purcell / Katherine Wood5-7, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Baltazar / Angela Hanson vs Sheila Spade / Deirdre Egan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Blankenbaker / Irene Salerno vs Savanna Rhodes / Sarah W Johnson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJill Siegel / Megan Crisham vs Crystal Leighton / Abigail Emerson3-6, 5-6
L#1 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Patricia Bustamante vs Cibele Medrano / Marina Minkina6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAli Gerstad / Irene Salerno vs Tammy Holme / Linda Anderson6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJean Soh / Laura Knapp vs Sue Christianson / Heather Vishnubhakat6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Dimitrina Schoyer vs Julie Schwan / Julie Steinberg2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesIrene Salerno / Angela Hanson vs Diane Egan / Rita Eichner7-5, 3-4
W#1 DoublesMarjorie Baltazar / Jean Soh vs Rosa Broseman / Janine Sheridan6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMaria Lobo-Corey / Svetlana Kanev vs Monique Melnick / Kelly Matthews-Pluta3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CDTA Fall Combo W 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA F Combo W7.5 HealthTrack Kerr Sun 10 $1760171391
2CDTA F Combo W7.5 Nielsen Lund Sat 4 $204213512114
3CDTA F Combo W7.5 MT Bann Cooper Sat 4 $25429921164
4CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22339921151
5CDTA F Combo W7.5 Centennial Spade Sun 1 $202461224185
6CDTA F Combo W7.5 Tam McKendry Sun 4 $221551327174
7CDTA F Combo W7.5 Glenbrook Turdo Sat 3 $251541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Jill Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Jean Soh
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Catherine Rigamer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Sarah Blankenbaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Patricia Bustamante
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Angela Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Ali Gerstad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Marjorie Baltazar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Renee Buxton
published 4
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.39
Dimitrina Schoyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Irene Salerno
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Svetlana Kanev
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Megan Crisham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Julie Hahn
published
Laura Knapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Soh + Maria Lobo-Corey6458% games+15.0% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Jill Siegel4366% games+11.8% vs expected
Marjorie Baltazar + Sarah Blankenbaker5558% games+11.5% vs expected
Jean Soh + Marjorie Baltazar10364% games+10.7% vs expected
Irene Salerno + Ali Gerstad4550% games+1.8% vs expected
Jean Soh + Angela Hanson151255% games+1.7% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Angela Hanson111449% games−0.2% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Irene Salerno16852% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Siegel
84W–79L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Jean Soh
468W–283L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Catherine Rigamer
75W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Elizabeth Quigley
103W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Sarah Blankenbaker
175W–175L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Patricia Bustamante
123W–102L career · 1 line in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Angela Hanson
119W–137L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Ali Gerstad
123W–151L career · 1 line in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Marjorie Baltazar
183W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
4
Renee Buxton
141W–123L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Dimitrina Schoyer
286W–188L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Irene Salerno
77W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Svetlana Kanev
123W–139L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Megan Crisham
138W–161L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Julie Hahn
127W–102L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Knapp
44W–45L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.