Teams

C 7.5W MM Frazier

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W TP Schaffner000000
2C 7.5W AVB Kerosky000000
3C 7.5W PM Nita000000
4C 7.5W CV Casamento000000
5C 7.5W MM Frazier000000
6C 7.5W PW Boeckman000000
7C 7.5W GR Daily000000
8C 7.5W MV Kirchick000000
9C 7.5W WR DeBoth000000
10C 7.5W CSC Goldberg000000
11C 7.5W CRC Ro000000
12C 7.5W WE Niehenke000000
13C 7.5W MV Zhang000000
14C 7.5W PW DeWerth000000
15C 7.5W NR Kneiss000000
16C 7.5W SP Gray000000
17C 7.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Joelle Moss
published
3.48
3.48
Ashley Kilbane
published 4
3.40
Natalie Levinson
published
3.37
Trina Galauner
published
3.29
Allyson Tancak
published 3.5
3.22
Ashley Frazier
published 3.5
3.21
Shelby Novick
published
2.98
Julia Pruchnicki
published
2.98
Alamelu Arakoni
published 3
2.88
Kin Mei
published
2.83
Tisha Bell
published
Isabella Heimke
published
Julie Visconsi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Levinson + Nile Whaley-Garrison10067% games+18.0% vs expected
Tisha Bell + Trina Galauner6752% games+1.3% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Tisha Bell1643% games+1.0% vs expected
Natalie Levinson + Kin Mei3455% gamesnot enough data
Tisha Bell + Shelby Novick4159% gamesnot enough data
Alamelu Arakoni + Shelby Novick213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Frazier + Isabella Heimke303 matchesnot enough data
Nile Whaley-Garrison + Allyson Tancak303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joelle Moss
15W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Nile Whaley-Garrison
53W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
4
Ashley Kilbane
69W–23L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Natalie Levinson
40W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Trina Galauner
91W–70L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Allyson Tancak
28W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Ashley Frazier
90W–59L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Shelby Novick
81W–37L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Julia Pruchnicki
37W–36L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.98
3
Alamelu Arakoni
127W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kin Mei
92W–78L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Tisha Bell
103W–90L career · no lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.83
Isabella Heimke
48W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Visconsi
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.