Teams

C 7.5W CV Casamento

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W TP Schaffner000000
2C 7.5W AVB Kerosky000000
3C 7.5W PM Nita000000
4C 7.5W CV Casamento000000
5C 7.5W MM Frazier000000
6C 7.5W PW Boeckman000000
7C 7.5W GR Daily000000
8C 7.5W MV Kirchick000000
9C 7.5W WR DeBoth000000
10C 7.5W CSC Goldberg000000
11C 7.5W CRC Ro000000
12C 7.5W WE Niehenke000000
13C 7.5W MV Zhang000000
14C 7.5W PW DeWerth000000
15C 7.5W NR Kneiss000000
16C 7.5W SP Gray000000
17C 7.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Kathleen Utech
published
3.57
Tara Limestoll
published
3.56
Laura Weyenberg
published
3.52
Robyn Forney
published
3.43
Cindy Ellis
published 4
3.40
Karen Witt
published
3.38
Rini Garber
published
3.38
Ali Payerl
published 3.5
3.37
Jamie Casamento
published
3.29
Nancy Kinnett
published
3.26
Nichole Carlisle
published
3.24
Alison Sikora
published 3.5
3.13
Julie Brubaker
published
3.13
Emily Szymanski
published
Jill Carroll
published
Kathy Olson
published
Lisa Dowling
published
Stacy Casamento
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Sikora + Nichole Carlisle7062% games+14.5% vs expected
Ali Payerl + Jamie Casamento16368% games+10.2% vs expected
Kathy Olson + Nancy Kinnett7356% games+5.5% vs expected
Emily Szymanski + Tara Limestoll231157% games+3.3% vs expected
Stacy Casamento + Laura Weyenberg20365% games+1.9% vs expected
Rini Garber + Cindy Ellis5354% games+1.4% vs expected
Robyn Forney + Cindy Ellis5358% games+0.1% vs expected
Stacy Casamento + Rini Garber5648% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Utech
27W–21L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Tara Limestoll
70W–59L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
Laura Weyenberg
142W–79L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Robyn Forney
40W–53L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Cindy Ellis
58W–65L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Karen Witt
55W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Rini Garber
41W–56L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Ali Payerl
47W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jamie Casamento
37W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Nancy Kinnett
102W–60L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Nichole Carlisle
42W–30L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Alison Sikora
61W–48L career · no lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Julie Brubaker
104W–107L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Emily Szymanski
91W–74L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.13
Jill Carroll
64W–51L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Olson
64W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Dowling
60W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacy Casamento
94W–47L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.