Teams

C 7.5W PM Nita

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

3 players · average NTRP / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W TP Schaffner000000
2C 7.5W AVB Kerosky000000
3C 7.5W PM Nita000000
4C 7.5W CV Casamento000000
5C 7.5W MM Frazier000000
6C 7.5W PW Boeckman000000
7C 7.5W GR Daily000000
8C 7.5W MV Kirchick000000
9C 7.5W WR DeBoth000000
10C 7.5W CSC Goldberg000000
11C 7.5W CRC Ro000000
12C 7.5W WE Niehenke000000
13C 7.5W MV Zhang000000
14C 7.5W PW DeWerth000000
15C 7.5W NR Kneiss000000
16C 7.5W SP Gray000000
17C 7.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Iuliana Nita
published
3.03
Jill Ratcliffe
published
2.66
Michaelia Cucci
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Iuliana Nita
119W–62L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Jill Ratcliffe
24W–100L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Michaelia Cucci
40W–52L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.