Teams

C 7.5W MV Zhang

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W TP Schaffner000000
2C 7.5W AVB Kerosky000000
3C 7.5W PM Nita000000
4C 7.5W CV Casamento000000
5C 7.5W MM Frazier000000
6C 7.5W PW Boeckman000000
7C 7.5W GR Daily000000
8C 7.5W MV Kirchick000000
9C 7.5W WR DeBoth000000
10C 7.5W CSC Goldberg000000
11C 7.5W CRC Ro000000
12C 7.5W WE Niehenke000000
13C 7.5W MV Zhang000000
14C 7.5W PW DeWerth000000
15C 7.5W NR Kneiss000000
16C 7.5W SP Gray000000
17C 7.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Yulia Lyublinski
published
3.46
Karen Cipriani
published
3.42
Pamela Zalba
published
3.33
Susan Vinborg
published
3.32
Libby Freeman
published
3.31
Janeen Miklowski
published
3.28
Chipo Jolibois
published 3.5
3.25
Kristin Chuko
published
3.22
Lishan Zhang
published
3.18
Carole Sanderson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Zalba + Kristin Chuko10357% games+8.4% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Lishan Zhang7254% games+8.0% vs expected
Janeen Miklowski + Chipo Jolibois3250% games+3.9% vs expected
Pamela Zalba + Yulia Lyublinski311258% games+3.4% vs expected
Chipo Jolibois + Lishan Zhang3742% games+2.9% vs expected
Janeen Miklowski + Kristin Chuko41344% games+2.6% vs expected
Chipo Jolibois + Pamela Zalba1446% games+1.5% vs expected
Janeen Miklowski + Yulia Lyublinski6651% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yulia Lyublinski
130W–75L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Karen Cipriani
88W–69L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Pamela Zalba
147W–134L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.42
Susan Vinborg
43W–66L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.33
Libby Freeman
38W–34L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Janeen Miklowski
75W–90L career · no lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Chipo Jolibois
83W–57L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Kristin Chuko
216W–143L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.25
Lishan Zhang
115W–84L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Carole Sanderson
152W–105L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.