Teams

C 7.5W GR Daily

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W TP Schaffner000000
2C 7.5W AVB Kerosky000000
3C 7.5W PM Nita000000
4C 7.5W CV Casamento000000
5C 7.5W MM Frazier000000
6C 7.5W PW Boeckman000000
7C 7.5W GR Daily000000
8C 7.5W MV Kirchick000000
9C 7.5W WR DeBoth000000
10C 7.5W CSC Goldberg000000
11C 7.5W CRC Ro000000
12C 7.5W WE Niehenke000000
13C 7.5W MV Zhang000000
14C 7.5W PW DeWerth000000
15C 7.5W NR Kneiss000000
16C 7.5W SP Gray000000
17C 7.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Jill Hanigofsky
published
3.77
Loralee Daily
published
3.56
Trisha Kohut
published
Emily Peel
published 3.5
3.14
Denise Fehr
published 3.5
2.90
Ginger Neely
published 3
Melissa Owen
published
Michelle Ross
published
Rochelle Kaiser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralee Daily + Jill Hanigofsky271057% games+6.1% vs expected
Jill Hanigofsky + Denise Fehr4355% games+1.9% vs expected
Loralee Daily + Trisha Kohut171448% games−4.3% vs expected
Trisha Kohut + Denise Fehr5155% gamesnot enough data
Trisha Kohut + Rochelle Kaiser224 matchesnot enough data
Trisha Kohut + Jill Hanigofsky134 matchesnot enough data
Loralee Daily + Melissa Owen213 matchesnot enough data
Loralee Daily + Denise Fehr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Hanigofsky
152W–97L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Loralee Daily
112W–89L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Trisha Kohut
61W–79L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Emily Peel
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Denise Fehr
101W–102L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Ginger Neely
69W–84L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Melissa Owen
46W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Ross
35W–50L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rochelle Kaiser
12W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.