Teams

C 7.5W TP Schaffner

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W TP Schaffner000000
2C 7.5W AVB Kerosky000000
3C 7.5W PM Nita000000
4C 7.5W CV Casamento000000
5C 7.5W MM Frazier000000
6C 7.5W PW Boeckman000000
7C 7.5W GR Daily000000
8C 7.5W MV Kirchick000000
9C 7.5W WR DeBoth000000
10C 7.5W CSC Goldberg000000
11C 7.5W CRC Ro000000
12C 7.5W WE Niehenke000000
13C 7.5W MV Zhang000000
14C 7.5W PW DeWerth000000
15C 7.5W NR Kneiss000000
16C 7.5W SP Gray000000
17C 7.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Shelby Schaffner
published
3.55
Hannah Lindesmith
published
3.40
Jamie Hilborn
published
3.31
Carolyn Cheverine
published 3.5
3.16
Christine Norman
published 3.5
3.14
Susan Voth
published
3.12
Laurice Moore
published
3.04
Johanna Nelsen
published
3.01
Jennifer Towell
published
2.82
Melissa Willett
published
Erin Gray
published
Jamie Fox
published
Kelley Jones
published
Michelle Fox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Cheverine + Christine Norman4655% games+17.1% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Erin Gray3252% games+6.9% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Jamie Fox6452% games+2.4% vs expected
Jamie Fox + Michelle Fox1543% games−2.8% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Hannah Lindesmith2945% games−4.0% vs expected
Melissa Willett + Susan Voth4446% games−9.7% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Michelle Fox1533% games−17.3% vs expected
Kelley Jones + Susan Voth3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Schaffner
73W–114L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Hannah Lindesmith
24W–18L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jamie Hilborn
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Carolyn Cheverine
133W–140L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Christine Norman
40W–73L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Susan Voth
81W–46L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Laurice Moore
47W–52L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Johanna Nelsen
46W–32L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jennifer Towell
44W–36L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Melissa Willett
103W–83L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Erin Gray
79W–54L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Fox
54W–53L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelley Jones
22W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Fox
69W–151L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.