Teams

Kraska - Tri-Level 18s 2.5/3.0/3.5

2022 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Leigh Abraham
published
3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.71
Lindsay Olin
published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.46
Elisabeth Kraska
published 3.5
3.39
Betsy Hooper
published 3.5
3.34
Tiana Pitts
published
3.18
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
3.17
Claire Driscoll
published 3.5
3.16
Amy Bunch
published 3.5
3.08
Sonia Haslam
published
2.90
Donna Burick
published 3
2.74
Cindy Wood
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiana Pitts + Amy Bunch5547% games+5.5% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+2.8% vs expected
Sonia Haslam + Amy Bunch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Abraham
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Stephanie Bettinger
26W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Lindsay Olin
19W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 7 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Betsy Hooper
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Tiana Pitts
38W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Britt Molitoris
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Bunch
31W–36L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Sonia Haslam
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Donna Burick
33W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Cindy Wood
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.