Teams

Hulse

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.39 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-15vs Schenk 7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Lanier / Jacqualyn Nelson vs Cindy Carr / Bonnie Peterson6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Fadness / Margo Nef vs Collette Bott / Lorraine Baker1-4
L#3 DoublesTeresa Beebe / Lisa Wheeler vs Tamara Gardner / Jackie Fuller6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-13vs Schenk 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Beebe / Lisa Wheeler vs Lorraine Baker / Collette Bott3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEli Griffin / Jacqualyn Nelson vs Nadine Ball / Julie Umphlette3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Lanier / Kathy Lloyd vs Tamara Gardner / Jackie Fuller1-6, 4-6
2023-05-12vs Schenk 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesMargo Nef / Angie Fadness vs Melanie Smith / Nadine Ball2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Wheeler / Teresa Beebe vs Tamara Gardner / Collette Bott7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEli Griffin / Jinny Boozer vs Vicki Krogstrand / Julie Umphlette7-6, 6-2
2023-05-08vs Schenk 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJinny Boozer / Eli Griffin vs Lorraine Baker / Collette Bott3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Beebe / Lisa Wheeler vs Cindy Carr / Bonnie Peterson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngie Fadness / Margo Nef vs Vicki Krogstrand / Melanie Smith6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-05-02vs Schenk 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Hulse / Rebecca Lanier vs Collette Bott / Tamara Gardner2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Jamison / Margo Nef vs Jackie Fuller / Ann Schenk6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Lloyd / Jacqualyn Nelson vs Nadine Ball / Melanie Smith4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-25vs Schenk 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Hulse / Debbie Hall vs Jackie Fuller / Kim Janes6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJacqualyn Nelson / Lisa Wheeler vs Tamara Gardner / Collette Bott1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Lloyd / Jinny Boozer vs Melanie Smith / Ann Schenk0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-22vs Schenk 7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesEli Griffin / Lisa Wheeler vs Tamara Gardner / Kim Janes7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Hulse / Debbie Hall vs Bonnie Peterson / Vicki Krogstrand7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jacqualyn Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Teresa Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.36
Margo Nef
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Angie Fadness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debbie Hall
published 3.5
3.11
Lisa Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Susan Hulse
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.03
Eli Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.65
Kathy Lloyd
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Jinny Boozer
published
Linda Jamison
published
Rebecca Lanier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqualyn Nelson + Eli Griffin3356% games+10.7% vs expected
Jacqualyn Nelson + Rebecca Lanier4358% games+6.1% vs expected
Susan Hulse + Kathy Lloyd6163% games+5.9% vs expected
Lisa Wheeler + Rebecca Lanier3255% games+3.4% vs expected
Jacqualyn Nelson + Margo Nef10556% games+2.9% vs expected
Susan Hulse + Rebecca Lanier13858% games+0.5% vs expected
Jacqualyn Nelson + Kathy Lloyd4843% games−0.4% vs expected
Angie Fadness + Margo Nef181255% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqualyn Nelson
214W–199L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Teresa Beebe
103W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Margo Nef
89W–70L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Angie Fadness
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Hall
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Lisa Wheeler
163W–168L career · 9 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Susan Hulse
276W–170L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.08
3.5
Eli Griffin
60W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Kathy Lloyd
41W–71L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jinny Boozer
63W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Jamison
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Lanier
88W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.