Teams

SMACK THAT

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - POCATELLO · Men 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-16vs BelnapSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJames Hickey / Zac Gershberg vs Cory Robertson / Jeremy Powell6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPhilip Jones vs Ryan Arfmann6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Brake / Nathan Richardson vs Troy Barnum / Joe Belnap4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoeri Klutsch / Joshua Ellis vs Douglas Weber / Aaron Brown6-4, 6-1
2025-07-10vs BelnapSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrent Harmon / James Hickey vs Troy Barnum / Joe Belnap2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesScott Stosich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBobby Arteaga / Zac Gershberg vs Cory Robertson / Jeremy Powell6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Brake / Joeri Klutsch vs Aaron Brown / Michael Allen6-4, 7-6
2025-07-01vs BelnapSplit 22
L#1 DoublesScott Stosich / Bobby Arteaga vs Cory Robertson / Jeremy Powell2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPhilip Jones vs James Skillings6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNathan Richardson / David Brake vs Michael Allen / Douglas Weber6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJoeri Klutsch / Joshua Ellis vs Aaron Brown / Piyush Sabharwall6-7, 3-6
2025-07-01vs BelnapSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Brake / Nathan Richardson vs Troy Barnum / Joe Belnap2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesZac Gershberg vs Cory Robertson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPhilip Jones / Joshua Ellis vs Jeremy Powell / James Skillings2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBobby Arteaga / Joeri Klutsch vs Michael Allen / Ryan Arfmann7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-26vs BelnapSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBobby Arteaga / Scott Stosich vs Joe Belnap / Ryan Arfmann7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPhilip Jones vs Michael Allen6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrent Harmon / Thomas Gwinn vs Aaron Brown / Troy Barnum7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Brake / Nathan Richardson vs James Skillings / Cory Robertson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-24vs BelnapLost 13
W#1 DoublesBobby Arteaga / Scott Stosich vs Douglas Weber / Ryan Arfmann6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Brake vs Cory Robertson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrent Harmon / Thomas Gwinn vs Troy Barnum / Aaron Brown3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoshua Ellis / Nathan Richardson vs Michael Allen / Piyush Sabharwall1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Belnap33131126234
2SMACK THAT33111329234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Zac Gershberg
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Philip Jones
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Thomas Gwinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Scott Stosich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.73
David Brake
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Joeri Klutsch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Bobby Arteaga
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Brent Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Nathan Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Joshua Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
James Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Brake + Nathan Richardson2546% games+6.5% vs expected
Zac Gershberg + Nathan Richardson5253% games+4.5% vs expected
Joshua Ellis + Nathan Richardson151150% games+4.2% vs expected
Joshua Ellis + Zac Gershberg8452% games+3.8% vs expected
Joeri Klutsch + Joshua Ellis1839% games+3.5% vs expected
Brent Harmon + Bobby Arteaga7851% games+1.4% vs expected
Philip Jones + David Brake10456% games+0.5% vs expected
Bobby Arteaga + David Brake5453% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Zac Gershberg
158W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Philip Jones
157W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Thomas Gwinn
190W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Scott Stosich
193W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
David Brake
257W–175L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Joeri Klutsch
164W–116L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Bobby Arteaga
139W–237L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Brent Harmon
201W–144L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Nathan Richardson
131W–138L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Joshua Ellis
217W–217L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
James Hickey
52W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.