Teams

JCC/Fish-Davis W3.0 (Team Default 3/2025)

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Friday · W3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-22vs Lakes/Frazier W3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesLily Fish / Heidi Hill vs Alta Frazier / Alison Bourgeois6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaniesha Matthews / Peggy Stanford vs Alisa Vitorino / Megan Kleiman2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-07vs Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLily Fish / Kristen Davis vs Melissa Graham / Andrea Herrod6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPeggy Stanford / Courtney Johnson vs Amanda Caldwell / Taylor Brookhart2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTaniesha Matthews / Megan Ratcliff vs Jillian Miller / Mckamy Looney3-6, 4-6
2025-02-28vs SpringPark BLUE/S. Nolen W3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Davis / Lily Fish vs Carol Chandler / Leslie Massenburg6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hill / Peggy Stanford vs Jackie Hurtado / Anna Knighton5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Ratcliff / Monica Susman vs Jennifer Thompson / Treva Grimshaw6-1, 6-0
2025-02-25vs Samuell Grand/Gleaton-Merrill W3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesKristen Davis / Lily Fish vs Heather Peracchi / Julie Forrest6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMegan Ratcliff vs Allison Methvin3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hill / Staci Cohen vs Bess Weeks / Ida Gleaton6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMonica Susman / Courtney Johnson vs PAM KARLOS / Katie Pearson4-6, 6-7
2025-02-14vs LifeTime Frisco/Arfa-Menhart W3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesKristen Davis / Lily Fish vs Julie Menhart / Traci Koen6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMegan Ratcliff vs Irene Castillo4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Johnson / Sarah Laibstain vs Angi DeAngelo / Renee Cooper3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTaniesha Matthews / Monica Susman vs Mayada Bazargani / Shannon Lundon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-07vs Huffhines/Williams-PingeltonWon 40
W#1 DoublesLily Fish / Kristen Davis vs Susan Deloach / Lauren Johnson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMegan Ratcliff vs Shelley Pingelton6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJaclyn Friedman / Courtney Johnson vs Jessica Williams / Leslie Loyd1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeggy Stanford / Taniesha Matthews vs Amy Enns / Kristine Munselle6-2, 6-4
2025-01-31vs McKinney/Bearden-Isle W3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesHeidi Hill / Staci Cohen vs Stacie Markley / Natalie Edmondson6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMegan Ratcliff vs Laura Pavelka4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Johnson / Sarah Laibstain vs Jennifer Bearden / Kelley McCall6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTaniesha Matthews / Monica Susman vs Lara Belle-Isle / Amy Russo1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-01-24vs Eldorado/Merrifield W3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Hill / Peggy Stanford vs Molly Conway / Jennifer Paulson6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMegan Ratcliff vs Stephanie Merrifield6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLily Fish / Sarah Laibstain vs Jessica Hoofnel / Rose Oswald6-0, 6-0
2025-01-17vs The Nelson/Galjour W3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLily Fish / Kristen Davis vs Leah Arnold / Christine Babcock1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMegan Ratcliff vs Carrie Neale4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Hill / Monica Susman vs Lorena Noguera Rivello / Kateri Dodson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTaniesha Matthews / Peggy Stanford vs Julie Galjour / Lorinda Nelson0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings47 teams · W3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stonebridge/Graham-Martinson W3.09029720233
2Fretz/Reist W3.08023920207
3Samuell Grand/Gleaton-Merrill W3.07125717208
4Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.07123923235
5The Nelson/Galjour W3.071221025238
6Wilkerson Sanders/Hall W3.07228821221
7Samuell Grand/Neblett-Norvell W3.07227926261
8Cooper Fitness/Liechty-Moore W3.072251126237
9High Point/Sealy-Friend W3.072231332283
10Canyon Creek/Butz W3.072221432266
11DAC/Kendall-Gaitonde W3.072201635316
12High Point/Lilley-Childress W3.06120819216
13DAC/Sisk-Lin W3.06225718182
14Lakes @ CH/McCarthy-Howard W3.06227519240
15Wagon Wheel/Hayes W3.063201639321
16JCC/Cloud-Austry W3.05219923247
17Lakes/Falke-Johnson W3.05219923218
18Samuell Grand/Mallory W3.053191330247
19Lakes/Frazier W3.053191331266
20Stonebriar/Boyd-Smith W3.054211535301
21Gleneagles/Shores-Kearney W3.054191738302
22Samuell Grand/Saunders W3.043141432268
23Brookhaven/Younts-Dorsey W3.044161639290
24T bar M/O'Brien-O'Grady W3.045191738283
25Garland/Grandle W3.045171943325
26DCC/Bennett-McCullough W3.034121634267
27McKinney/Bearden-Isle W3.035151737284
28LifeTime Frisco/Arfa-Menhart W3.035151737296
29SpringPark BLUE/S. Nolen W3.035131940291
30Lakes @ CH/Springer36162040310
31Greenhill/Savelli-Curtis W3.036152146324
32Greenhill/Wilson-Tufro-Garcia W3.025111737269
33Stonebridge/Flock-Saunders W3.02591940286
34SpringPark RED/S. Nolen W3.026122043309
35Greenhill/Dale-Stephens W3.02682450342
36Bent Tree/Grzych-Foster2662653342
37Samuell Grand/Jordan-Taylor W3.027122451359
38Royal Oaks/Bard W3.027112552363
39Lakewood/Dorf-Harrison W3.027112552370
40RGAC/DopkinsW3.01682041294
41JCC/Soare-Shapira W3.01782450330
42Eldorado/Merrifield W3.01762653349
43Fretz/Lyons-Anderson W3.018102655386
44Chandlers Landing/Brummett-LaCorte W3.01882859381
45Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.01872961404
46JCC/Fish-Davis W3.0 (Team Default 3/2025)000000
47Huffhines/Williams-Pingelton0862652354

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jaclyn Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Sarah Laibstain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Lily Fish
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
2.89
Megan Ratcliff
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Taniesha Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.64
Monica Susman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Peggy Stanford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Staci Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Stanford + Monica Susman224 matchesnot enough data
Peggy Stanford + Taniesha Matthews213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jaclyn Friedman
21W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.07
Sarah Laibstain
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lily Fish
25W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Megan Ratcliff
9W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Taniesha Matthews
6W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Monica Susman
12W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Peggy Stanford
9W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Staci Cohen
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.