Teams

Crothers- Serve Me A Doubles

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-13vs Schmidt/PlowmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kathy Cooke vs Megan Ullmann / Leslie Sampson6-3, 6-1
2022-08-10vs Treat-NLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Cooke / Kate Quisling vs Tiffany Bowie / Valerie Neill4-6, 1-6
2022-08-10vs Ash-Spin CityWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kathy Cooke vs Carol Glenn / Jane Paulsen7-6, 6-1
2022-08-09vs Hicks/WilsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Kathy Cooke vs Molly Wilson / Amy Hicks5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-14vs Wagner-Fine 29!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Sarie Crothers vs Shannon Davis / Audrey Weil6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-08vs Mori-Love & RacquetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kathy Cooke vs Meegan Fruits / Jean Zuber Marshburn1-6, 3-6
2022-06-24vs Kjos-Fantastic Four(Hands)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kathy Cooke vs Rebecca Griffith / Ericka Nelson2-6, 3-6
2022-06-21vs GhaziWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate Quisling / Sarie Crothers vs Phyllis Ghazi / Victoria Cooper7-5, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings25 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mori-Love & Racquets8080139
2Kraus-Klarson7171256
3Corwin7171452
4Kjos-Fantastic Four(Hands)6262448
5Park-Matilda PDX5353646
6Treat-N5353767
7Dixit-Slice Girls!5353760
8Heyworth/Laing5353757
9Wilkins-Won Love5353877
10Schmidt/Plowman4444860
11Ash-Spin City4444977
12Convery-Webb4444978
13Crothers- Serve Me A Doubles44441077
14Dempsey-R44441078
15Wagner-Fine 29!44441181
16Gram/Seeger44441173
17Nelson-Mother/Daughter Duo44441289
18Pacioni/De Silva35351181
19Cartwright-Dubs4Fun35351280
20Stevenson/Bourland35351287
21Thakkar-Girls Just Want 2 Have Fun26261494
22Bunch26261491
23Ross-Brockett17171486
24Hicks/Wilson17171598
25Ghazi08081691

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Sarie Crothers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Kathy Cooke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Kate Quisling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Cooke + Sarie Crothers3354% games+7.5% vs expected
Kathy Cooke + Kate Quisling4844% games−6.6% vs expected
Kate Quisling + Sarie Crothers3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarie Crothers
65W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Kathy Cooke
60W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Kate Quisling
46W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.