Teams

TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-10-07vs JCugliari (BCC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Kimberly Hoben vs Courtney Broadway / Wendy Lutgring6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFumiyo Ono / Liz Misenheimer vs Jacqueline Cugliari / Angie Brogdon6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Daniels-Lynch / Nily Willis vs Patti Zakow / Ami Stein6-1, 6-2
2024-10-04vs TDries/TOrmand (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Bach / Nily Willis vs Taylor Dries / Tanya Ormand6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Daniels-Lynch / Nancy Miller vs Sybil Cioffi / Megan Bishop Quirk6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanna Jean Pompeo / Fumiyo Ono vs Barbara Chase / Robin Caruso3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-03vs EMcCombs (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTricia Green / Kimberly Hoben vs Cynthia Burns / Barb Marthinsen6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Miller / Karen Daniels-Lynch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-27vs VAke (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesTricia Green / Kimberly Hoben vs Suzy Johnson / Valorie Ake2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLiz Misenheimer / Fumiyo Ono vs Thanh Nga McIver / Jill Marcus3-6, 3-6
2024-09-20vs AConger/EFarnham (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Kimberly Hoben vs Courtney Reynolds / Enid Randall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Bach / Liz Misenheimer vs Christina McWilliams / Ashley Smith6-2, 6-3
2024-09-13vs AAbbott (Charlotte CC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Daniels-Lynch / Nancy Miller vs Henrietta Richardson / Christina Desai7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTricia Green / Nily Willis vs Carrie Fisher / Spencer Blythe6-4, 6-3
2024-09-06vs HPhelps/Sheeler (Bridgehampton)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Bach / Liz Misenheimer vs Cyndi Sheeler / Heather Hope7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Kimberly Hoben vs Allison Mitchell / Joelle Surprenant7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Miller / Fumiyo Ono vs Lisa Laws / Dawn Greenaway6-4, 6-4
2024-08-30vs RKartes (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesFumiyo Ono / Nily Willis vs Amy Varner / Meredith Sweeney1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTricia Green / Kimberly Hoben vs Shannon Horton / Lauren Mulcahy6-0, 6-0
2024-08-23vs KVerrill (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Hiteshew / Kimberly Hoben vs Marci McGee / Susan Sutherland6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Daniels-Lynch / Nancy Miller vs Julie Jenkins / Laurie Canata6-2, 6-0
2024-08-16vs TKessler/Ware (Queens)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Bach / Nily Willis vs Amanda Price / Stuart Pfeifer7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTricia Green / Liz Misenheimer vs Mollie James / Ashley Barton1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFumiyo Ono / Nancy Miller vs Meg Perry / Amy Langdon5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Amy Guear
published 4.5
4.16
Karen Daniels-Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Heather Hiteshew
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Fumiyo Ono
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.07
Diane Bach
published 4.5
4.00
3.86
Liz Misenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Kimberly Hoben
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.79
Nily Willis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Nancy Miller
published
Tricia Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Miller + Danna Jean Pompeo9458% games+1.5% vs expected
Liz Misenheimer + Fumiyo Ono12657% games−0.8% vs expected
Liz Misenheimer + Nily Willis5549% gamesnot enough data
Karen Daniels-Lynch + Fumiyo Ono6350% gamesnot enough data
Fumiyo Ono + Nily Willis4258% gamesnot enough data
Heather Hiteshew + Nily Willis3248% gamesnot enough data
Heather Hiteshew + Kimberly Hoben314 matchesnot enough data
Nily Willis + Kimberly Hoben224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Guear
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Karen Daniels-Lynch
139W–36L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Heather Hiteshew
114W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Fumiyo Ono
100W–51L career · 6 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Diane Bach
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.07
4
Danna Jean Pompeo
40W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Liz Misenheimer
117W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Kimberly Hoben
56W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Nancy Miller
57W–35L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Tricia Green
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.