Teams

NITA E 40W40a TAM (Lobo-Corey/Varcheva)

2023 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Christine Meade vs Cindy Bielik / Kelly Good6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Conni Stinek vs Lisa Rowen / Laurie Knutte6-7, 5-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYumi Ida / Masako Ueda vs Marinne Leonard / Kerri Sedlacek3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Martha Davis vs Kelly O'Donnell / Ceyda Arslan6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Denise Huth6-1, 5-3
L#2 DoublesSue Wissing / Christine Meade vs Shannon Ebner / Kristin Collins6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Hahn / Laura Knapp vs Lorraine Wong / Julie Boruff6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Julie Weidner vs Keli Redinger / Darci Trout3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs ANDREA TAHLIER6-2, 6-5
W#2 DoublesKate Newman / Conni Stinek vs Jennifer Peterson / Ying Zhang1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Kasiurak / Laura Knapp vs Lisa Atansio / Maria Carandang6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesKate Newman / Conni Stinek vs Kimberly Ricchio / Hoda Elshakankery1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Laura Hansen2-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesSue Wissing / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Debra Brambora / Donna Matkovic6-7, 2-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Knapp / DANIELLE ARENDS vs Raquel Karpinski / Roseann Solak1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesJean Soh / Dawn Baumann vs Colleen Stover / Margaret Chung7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Sally Washlow4-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Rebecca Daly vs Ann Murtaugh / Tracy Richards6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMasako Ueda / Yumi Ida vs Molly McGinnis / Heidi Darley5-7, 3-6
2022-10-29vs NITA E 40W40b Rush Copley (Adams)Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKate Newman / Julie Weidner vs Anitra Willis / Colleen Chionis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Kristy Sweigard6-4, 1-5
L#2 DoublesSue Wissing / Conni Stinek vs Alicja Kujalowicz / Sara Marberry5-7, 4-5
L#3 DoublesKathy Kasiurak / DANIELLE ARENDS vs Laura Skuja / Anna Hartford1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Martha Davis vs Dorothy OMalley / Amy Harper7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Denise Rippetoe-Reed6-3, 5-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Weidner / Kate Newman vs Lori Toney / Alicia Yaeger6-7, 3-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Hahn / Laura Knapp vs Karen Jackson / Rhonda Williams6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Quigley / Dawn Baumann vs Judy Morgan / Allison Goldberg4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Heidi Nickel3-6, 3-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Jean Soh vs Dayle Levine / Jessica Kray6-2, 5-4
L#3 DoublesKate Newman / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Anna Dau / Bela Starkman3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W40b Rush Copley (Adams)7124822212
2NITA E 40W40e Racquet Club LB (Geary)71211128230
3NITA E 40W40f Score (Bianchi/Knutte)62191328229
4NITA E 40W40c Centre Court AC (Ricchio/Brambora)44171533242
5NITA E 40W40a TAM (Lobo-Corey/Varcheva)44161637286
6NITA E 40W40d Oak Brook TC (Lukas/Cushing)35181432273
7NITA E 40W40g Hinsdale RC (Scrogin/Hennessey)35141841276
8NITA E 40W40h Courts Plus (Barsotti)26131940296
9NITA E 40W40i Five Star (Yaeger/Young)0823061373

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Christine Meade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Dawn Baumann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Jean Soh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Yumi Ida
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Elizabeth Quigley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Teodora Varcheva
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Kate Newman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Sue Wissing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Martha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Rebecca Daly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Conni Stinek
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Kathy Kasiurak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
DANIELLE ARENDS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julie Hahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Knapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Soh + Maria Lobo-Corey6458% games+15.0% vs expected
Martha Davis + Christine Meade12562% games+7.4% vs expected
Christine Meade + Julie Weidner7259% games+6.7% vs expected
Martha Davis + Rebecca Daly7260% games+6.7% vs expected
Maria Lobo-Corey + Christine Meade5361% games+6.3% vs expected
Kathy Kasiurak + Masako Ueda20161% games+5.6% vs expected
Jean Soh + Martha Davis4356% games+3.6% vs expected
Julie Weidner + Masako Ueda5258% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Meade
279W–180L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Jean Soh
468W–283L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Elizabeth Quigley
103W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
Teodora Varcheva
103W–129L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
Kate Newman
44W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Sue Wissing
64W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Martha Davis
349W–162L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Rebecca Daly
129W–147L career · 1 line in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
DANIELLE ARENDS
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Julie Hahn
127W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Knapp
44W–45L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.