Teams

WSC-Sheldon-Smith

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.27 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2020-11-01vs AYTC (OUTDOORS) Edwards 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBetty Hummer / Susan Thim vs Michelle Osborn / Karalyn Kedroske2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammi Walker / Deanne Angell vs Anna Karlin / Michelle Hill6-3, 6-6
L#3 DoublesJude Neldam / Margaret Cobb vs Nancy Edwards / Nancy Roma3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-10-17vs EDG-The Fun Bus-Kainz 55Split 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Cobb / Lauren Anderson vs Michelle Kutz / Shelley Chapman1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Sheldon-Smith / Chris Gonzales vs Judy Rogers / Anne Czerkawski2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2020-10-10vs BC-Seniorettes-WalkerWon 21
W#1 DoublesBetty Hummer / Susan Thim vs Andrea Snyder / Susan Sacks6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammi Walker / Deanne Angell vs Ingrid Sarapuu / Vikki Littleman6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarla Vasilatos / Chris Gonzales vs Beth Smith / Jane Thomas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2020-10-03vs HBSQ-VitcovichLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Anderson / Tammi Walker vs Kimberly Dirksen / Traci Huffer3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLori Harris / Susan Thim vs Fran Joy / Carrie Wallace6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Sheldon-Smith / Chris Gonzales vs Nancy Burdyshaw / Leah Vitcovich5-7, 4-6
2020-09-27vs CAC/SL-KingWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetty Hummer / Susan Thim vs Laurie Hofmann / Gail Case7-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesChris Gonzales / Deanne Angell vs Rhonda Jaffe / Teresa King6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDarlene Jones / Kathleen Sheldon-Smith vs Michelle Michael / Marilyn Pricco4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2020-09-19vs BETC-KamplaineWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetty Hummer / Susan Thim vs Joan Edwards / Sally Linebarger6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Anderson / Tammi Walker vs Diane Weiser / Pam Butterfield6-2, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Sheldon-Smith / Jude Neldam vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-09-05vs Lower Woodland-Team Thing-StoneLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetty Hummer / Susan Thim vs Leona De Rocco / Kathy McCann2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Cobb / Tammi Walker vs Kathryn Sullivan / Robin Trucksess2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarla Vasilatos / Lori Harris vs Carole Anderson / Blair Stone6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lower Woodland-Team Thing-Stone802228149
2HBSQ-Vitcovich6215920189
3AYTC (OUTDOORS) Edwards 7.062141022212
4BETC-Hollar4312918179
5CP-Team Kaboom-Czerwinski43101126202
6BETC-Kamplaine44101428220
7EDG-The Fun Bus-Kainz 5544111330203
8BC-Vintage-Anderson3481331207
9BC-Seniorettes-Walker35111329236
10WSC-Sheldon-Smith35101432228
11TCSP-Nevertheless...Ellison2581328207
12RBW-Williams26111328191
13Lower Woodland-Hart0741736235
14CAC/SL-King0842042272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Betty Hummer
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.23
Tammi Walker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Susan Thim
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Darlene Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Deanne Angell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lauren Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Jude Neldam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Lori Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Marla Vasilatos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Margaret Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Chris Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanne Angell + Tammi Walker6064% games+13.4% vs expected
Betty Hummer + Susan Thim7256% games+1.1% vs expected
Lauren Anderson + Lori Harris1443% games−2.3% vs expected
Tammi Walker + Lauren Anderson102045% games−3.6% vs expected
Margaret Cobb + Susan Thim31139% games−7.4% vs expected
Margaret Cobb + Lori Harris01634% games−9.0% vs expected
Margaret Cobb + Lauren Anderson2636% games−11.4% vs expected
Marla Vasilatos + Lori Harris1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betty Hummer
81W–94L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Tammi Walker
46W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Susan Thim
47W–73L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Darlene Jones
27W–25L career · 1 line in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Deanne Angell
54W–66L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Lauren Anderson
30W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Jude Neldam
66W–59L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Lori Harris
15W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Marla Vasilatos
20W–48L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Margaret Cobb
24W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Chris Gonzales
57W–97L career · 4 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.