Teams

EDG-Tennacity-Wilken

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-11-08vs AYTC-Fight Club 2.0-RossLost 12
W#1 DoublesHarold Zagunis / Ying-Fang Lai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Recchi / Maria Recchi vs Megan Kelton / Kiyon Ross0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoel Higgins / Amy Higgins vs Alma Estioco / Alfredo Santamaria1-6, 4-6
2020-10-24vs BC-Camara 2021-7.0-Mixed 18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusanna Wilken / Lance Wilken vs Nancy Fletcher / Matthew Scher0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPia Jacobsen / John Jacobsen vs Johan Bjorklund / Marilyn Johnson4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesYing-Fang Lai / Joel Higgins vs Jeffrey Stoner / Eileen Wang1-6, 0-6
2020-10-10vs RBW-MyerchinWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrook Koski / Lance Wilken vs Sandy Myerchin / Mike Rasanen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Recchi / Peter Recchi vs Linda Cowin / Michael Nolan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPia Jacobsen / John Jacobsen vs Rene Egnal / Mathew Isaac6-3, 6-4
2020-10-04vs TCSP-Squirrel Badgers-GoldenLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Higgins / Harold Zagunis vs Wendy Sowers / Russ Berkman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKen Tian / Ying-Fang Lai vs Lexie Miller / Tyler Gardner6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLance Wilken / Susanna Wilken vs Megan Hill / Karan Kohli4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBrook Koski / Harold Zagunis vs Chandran Mudhliar / Samantha MacDuff7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPia Jacobsen / John Jacobsen vs Ryan Hardie / Nicole Hardie6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2020-09-13vs ETC-PhamLost 03
L#1 DoublesYing-Fang Lai / Ken Tian vs Kendra Maeser / Vietlong Le3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusanna Wilken / Lance Wilken vs Monica Seth / Jeremy Cheung1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrook Koski / Joel Higgins vs Anabela Torrealba / Tue Khuc2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BETC-Nguyen601718112
2AYTC-Servers-Pereira601449124
3TCSP-Squirrel Badgers-Golden6013514138
4MC-Kool Katz 2-Lee6014415151
5WSC-Woodinville Winos-Mar511538118
6EDG-Mold Removers-Young5113514153
7FC-PNW10sPros-Ramos5112615147
8ETC-Pham4213511136
9RBW-Twins-Liu4213512111
10PL-Bourbon Bashers-Escalona4211716151
11ETC-Titans 7.0-Box4212617138
12BC-Camara 2021-7.0-Mixed 184211717160
13RBW-Smith429918158
14CAC/SL-Quarentennis-Carey339918154
15AYTC-Fight Club 2.0-Ross339920154
16AYTC (OUTDOORS) Sieg3381021177
17AYTC (OUTDOORS) Vichitthavong-Yeet Fleet3310821161
18BC-TOGS-Thompson339921156
19AYTC-Lucky 7s-Chan3381022181
20AYTC (OUTDOORS) Nguyen3381024180
21Lower Woodland-Scrappy-Shankers-Karlin3381024190
22CAC/SL-Cobra Kai-Betancourt2481021166
23ETC-Zhu2481022178
24TCSP-Lampitt2461225192
25BC-Clemente2461226169
26BTA-Mixed Shots-Dalal2471126185
27AYTC (OUTDOORS) Breaking Bad-Cowden-Templeton2461227193
28CP-Aces Wild-Doyle1571124178
29WSC-Chin1551328192
30EDG-Tennacity-Wilken1541429188
31ETC-Whitney1551330207
32WSC-Shot Makers-Hartnett1531531202
33PL-Licholai0651327192
34RBW-Myerchin0651327190
35FC-Basha 7.00631532210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Maria Recchi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Ying-Fang Lai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
John Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Lance Wilken
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Joel Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Pia Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Brook Koski
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Amy Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Susanna Wilken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joel Higgins + Amy Higgins172747% games−2.8% vs expected
Pia Jacobsen + John Jacobsen3545% games−2.8% vs expected
Susanna Wilken + Lance Wilken51437% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maria Recchi
126W–129L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Ying-Fang Lai
171W–77L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
John Jacobsen
42W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Lance Wilken
44W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3
Joel Higgins
103W–88L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Pia Jacobsen
45W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Brook Koski
44W–82L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Amy Higgins
90W–112L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Susanna Wilken
85W–77L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.