Teams

MSIL 7.5W Combo Deschler-Champaign

2022 MSIL Fall Combo · East MSIL 7.5W Combo

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-03vs MSIL 7.5W Combo Golden-DanvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesFelina Kelly / Diane Pelafos vs Amanda Campbell / Michelle Erickson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeth Hoag / Shen Dirkes vs Cheryl Girton / Marla Golden6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesFelina Kelly / Mary Krauklis vs Lisa Fritscher / Laura Sonnichsen6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Reynen / Minsun Kim vs Teri Scaggs / Kortnie Lovell3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShen Dirkes / Sarah Benevento vs Laura Boualavong / Melissa Willenborg6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-11-19vs MSIL 7.5W Combo Golden-DanvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSally Boland / Rebecca Hoch vs Cheryl Girton / Marla Golden0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Krauklis / Dorothy Deschler vs Stacy Wells / Carla Smith6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Krauklis / Sally Boland vs Patsy Conley / Laura Sonnichsen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Pelafos / Jill Reynen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesBeth Hoag / Cynthia Ottemann vs Sara Johnson / Clair Kaye1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFelina Kelly / Sally Boland vs Angela Woods / Laura Sonnichsen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Novitsky / Minsun Kim vs Lisa Fritscher / Vickie Murphy3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-11-05vs MSIL 7.5W Combo Golden-DanvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesFelina Kelly / Dorothy Deschler vs Amanda Campbell / Marla Golden3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Hoag / Minsun Kim vs Stacy Wells / Zlatka Jeliazkova6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSally Boland / Cynthia Ottemann vs MacKenzie Kurth / Pamela ZuHone6-3, 6-1
2022-10-29vs MSIL 7.5W Combo Golden-DanvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Novitsky / Sarah Benevento vs Amanda Campbell / Pamela ZuHone6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFelina Kelly / Sally Boland vs Cheryl Girton / Marla Golden6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesFelina Kelly / Mary Krauklis vs Angela Woods / Clair Kaye6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Novitsky / Minsun Kim vs Barbara Utz / Karly Wiedman6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for East MSIL 7.5W Combo have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Felina Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Beth Hoag
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Susan Novitsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Molly Tracy
published 4
3.66
Sarah Benevento
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Diane Pelafos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Cynthia Ottemann
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Sally Boland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Satomi Baumgartner
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Jill Reynen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Dorothy Deschler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mary Krauklis
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Minsun Kim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Hoch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shen Dirkes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dorothy Deschler + Satomi Baumgartner6160% games+7.1% vs expected
Jill Reynen + Minsun Kim11653% games+6.2% vs expected
Jill Reynen + Sarah Benevento5456% games+0.4% vs expected
Molly Tracy + Beth Hoag6357% games−1.9% vs expected
Susan Novitsky + Beth Hoag1638% games−8.0% vs expected
Minsun Kim + Beth Hoag8165% gamesnot enough data
Dorothy Deschler + Diane Pelafos3550% gamesnot enough data
Molly Tracy + Susan Novitsky5256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Felina Kelly
71W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Beth Hoag
60W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Susan Novitsky
76W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Molly Tracy
107W–97L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Sarah Benevento
52W–29L career · 8 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Diane Pelafos
68W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cynthia Ottemann
133W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Sally Boland
161W–128L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Satomi Baumgartner
83W–46L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Jill Reynen
69W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dorothy Deschler
133W–128L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mary Krauklis
11W–10L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Minsun Kim
110W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Hoch
40W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shen Dirkes
52W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.