Teams

SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS

2022 NTA SUMMER LEAGUE · 4.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.95 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-22vs TPCWon 21
W#1 Female SinglesAmanda Comtois vs Mandy Hansen6-1, 6-0
L#2 Female DoublesJosephine McPeak / Kayla Blum vs Kati Bainbridge / Kimberly Simons6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 Female DoublesLindsey Lanni / Gretchen Moy vs Rowena Messner / Fiona Yeh6-4, 6-0
2022-08-08vs RED ROCK CCWon 40
W#1 Female DoublesKatelyn McCullough / Candy Rosenberg vs Michele Howser / Vicki Underwood7-6, 6-0
W#1 Female SinglesAmanda Comtois vs Patti Tolli6-2, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesLindsey Lanni / Tami Vannah vs Paige Song / Hayley Rodes6-1, 6-1
W#3 Female DoublesBing Zou / Amy Levasseur vs Kimberly Lukasiak / Pilar Ahlstrom6-2, 7-6
2022-08-01vs ANTHEM CCWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesJosephine McPeak / Tricia Miller vs Sheri Grossberg / Annie Guiliano6-4, 6-4
W#2 Female DoublesAmanda Comtois / Lindsey Lanni vs Allison Festa / Heidi Thornhill6-3, 6-2
W#3 Female DoublesCandy Rosenberg / Amy Levasseur vs Ruth-Ann Edwards / Heather George6-2, 6-1
2022-07-25vs SPANISH TRAILLost 13
L#1 Female DoublesBing Zou / Candy Rosenberg vs Julie Mersch / Jennifer Togliatti6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 Female SinglesAmanda Comtois vs Lesley Chan6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesAmy Levasseur / Josephine McPeak vs Shannon Ashcraft / April Denise Belcher4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesKrista Diaz / Katelyn McCullough vs Diona Fonte / Danielle Dyer3-6, 1-6
2022-07-18vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 13
L#1 Female DoublesCandy Rosenberg / Tricia Miller vs Kevan Ommen / Esther Tan2-6, 2-6
L#1 Female SinglesAmanda Comtois vs Lauren Vermeys4-6, 4-6
W#2 Female DoublesKatelyn McCullough / Gretchen Moy vs Joann Komanowski / Cynthia Graham7-6, 6-2
L#3 Female DoublesJosephine McPeak / Amy Levasseur vs Sonia Vermeys / Amy Nhaisi5-7, 3-6
2022-07-11vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1Won 21
W#1 Female DoublesTricia Miller / Candy Rosenberg vs Maria Gonzales / Cathy Vanderford1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesJosephine McPeak / Bing Zou vs Diane Welch / Shani Ma6-2, 6-4
L#3 Female DoublesKrista Diaz / Kayla Blum vs Jennifer Gleason / Jan Willis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Katelyn McCullough
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 17% · published 4
4.02
Candy Rosenberg
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Kayla Blum
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Josephine McPeak
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Lindsey Lanni
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 4
3.86
Bing Zou
published 4
3.78
Amanda Comtois
usually #1 Female Singles 80%, also #2 Female Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Tricia Miller
published
3.76
Tami Vannah
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Gretchen Moy
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Amy Levasseur
usually #3 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
Krista Diaz
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bing Zou + Katelyn McCullough4261% games+17.1% vs expected
Krista Diaz + Josephine McPeak9458% games+14.3% vs expected
Gretchen Moy + Katelyn McCullough9263% games+14.1% vs expected
Kayla Blum + Katelyn McCullough6163% games+13.4% vs expected
Tricia Miller + Katelyn McCullough5259% games+9.7% vs expected
Krista Diaz + Lindsey Lanni171256% games+9.5% vs expected
Kayla Blum + Lindsey Lanni5650% games+8.6% vs expected
Gretchen Moy + Kayla Blum15463% games+8.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katelyn McCullough
181W–121L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
4.05
4
Candy Rosenberg
256W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Kayla Blum
230W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Josephine McPeak
239W–178L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Lindsey Lanni
187W–125L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Bing Zou
176W–81L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Amanda Comtois
87W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Tricia Miller
217W–124L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Tami Vannah
360W–151L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Gretchen Moy
267W–154L career · 2 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Amy Levasseur
311W–278L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Krista Diaz
139W–90L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.