Teams

Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W AM

19 players · average NTRP 3.95 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-12vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonWon 10
W#1 DoublesRosa McGuire / Maria Womack vs Jamie Price / Mindy Christofferson6-2, 6-2
2021-08-05vs Sports Mall-Johnson/ScharmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesRosa McGuire / Maria Womack vs Heidi Maxfield / Kimberly Rowland6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Hronek / Rachel Labrum vs Kristi Warren / Sarah Love5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-29vs Golds Gym-Blackhurst/AllenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMandy Berg / Cari Walsh vs Kaori Allen / Nancy Kirk7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Labrum / Nicole Mills vs Belinda Jensen / Tena Maughan0-6, 4-6
2021-07-22Split 11
W#1 DoublesRina Benson / Paige Coward vs Kimberly Simpson / Kristi Roggensack6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRachel Labrum / Stephanie Tagge vs Susan Koelliker / Christine Fotheringham6-7, 3-6
2021-07-15vs RISE AC-OlsenWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Mills / Rosa McGuire vs Cynthia Sterner / Tanya Beard6-2, 6-1
2021-07-01vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonWon 20
W#1 DoublesRosa McGuire / Maria Womack vs Lori Murdock / Christine Neeleman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCari Walsh / Rina Benson vs Jamie Price / Heather Jensen6-2, 6-2
2021-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGail Levee / Rina Benson vs Robyn Scharman / Joanna Heiden6-7, 2-6
2021-06-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Mills / Angie Neuberger vs Nancy Kirk / Shelli Johnston1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Rina Benson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Rachel Labrum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Joanna Larsen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Ann Hronek
published 4
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Tagge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Lindsey Ramage
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.56
Angie Neuberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Nicole Mills
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Katri Koehle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Gail Levee
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.79
Marian Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Cari Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Womack
published
Michele Smith
published
Veronica Miller
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Benson + Rosa McGuire6083% games+16.7% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Katri Koehle2349% games+11.8% vs expected
Lindsey Ramage + Kim Santiago25859% games+9.6% vs expected
Katri Koehle + Kim Santiago5068% games+8.3% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+8.3% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Rosa McGuire22763% games+8.2% vs expected
Rina Benson + Nicole Mills7260% games+4.8% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Lindsey Ramage14160% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Rina Benson
119W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
Joanna Larsen
42W–73L career · 6 lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Ann Hronek
65W–44L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Stephanie Tagge
11W–24L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Lindsey Ramage
186W–128L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Angie Neuberger
73W–76L career · 1 line in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Nicole Mills
88W–75L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
Katri Koehle
84W–81L career · 1 line in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gail Levee
30W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.88
Marian Christensen
32W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
Cari Walsh
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Maria Womack
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Veronica Miller
40W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.