Teams

Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.92 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-03Won 20
W#1 DoublesKalee King / Rachel Labrum vs Catherine Bliss / Kristi Roggensack6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Neuberger / Nicole Mills vs Heather Paddock / Mary Young6-3, 7-5
2021-05-27vs Spanish Fork-Harlan.MoretensenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnn Hronek / Rachel Labrum vs Shannon Shepherd / Cheryl Harker6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRina Benson / Mandy Berg vs Tamara Miller / Denise Daniels3-6, 3-6
2021-05-20vs Ivory Ridge-Boren/OwensWon 10
W#2 DoublesAngie Neuberger / Mallory Neuberger vs Megan Warren / Christy Owens6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-13vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-McDonald/JonesLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Hronek / Nicole Mills vs Ann Trentman / Susan Knight6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMandy Berg vs Kyra Dunshee6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRina Benson / Angie Neuberger vs Kelle Jones / Karen Borski2-6, 4-6
2021-05-06Split 11
W#2 DoublesAnn Hronek / Rachel Labrum vs Anji DowDell / Lindie Hoggan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKalee King / Stephanie Tagge vs Janice Smith / Carole Sharp0-6, 2-6
2021-04-29vs Sports Mall-Heikkila/WallaceLost 12
L#1 DoublesRina Benson / Mandy Berg vs Kimberly Rowland / Kristi Warren6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSamantha Berg vs Alyson Ellis3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Hronek / Rachel Labrum vs Nanette Heath / Heather Paddock4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-22vs Spanish Fork-Harlan.MoretensenWon 30
W#2 DoublesKalee King / Rachel Labrum vs Shannon Shepherd / Traci Church6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSamantha Berg vs Beth Ann Crane6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMandy Berg / Ann Hronek vs DeeAnn Edwards / Nan Black3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-16Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Hronek / Rachel Labrum vs Amy Boren / Nicole Holland3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMandy Berg / Kalee King vs Shannon Mangum / Jodie Monson6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Rosa McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 4.5
3.88
Mandy Berg
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Rina Benson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Rachel Labrum
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Joanna Larsen
published
Ann Hronek
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Tagge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Lindsey Ramage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.56
Angie Neuberger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Nicole Mills
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.18
Kathy Vicars
published 3.5
3.10
Katri Koehle
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.08
Samantha Berg
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Gail Levee
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.79
Marian Christensen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rina Benson + Rosa McGuire6083% games+16.7% vs expected
Mandy Berg + Katri Koehle2349% games+11.8% vs expected
Lindsey Ramage + Kim Santiago25859% games+9.6% vs expected
Katri Koehle + Kim Santiago5068% games+8.3% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+8.3% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Rosa McGuire22763% games+8.2% vs expected
Rina Benson + Nicole Mills7260% games+4.8% vs expected
Nicole Mills + Lindsey Ramage14160% games+4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rosa McGuire
155W–42L career · 9 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Rina Benson
119W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
Joanna Larsen
42W–73L career · no lines in 2021
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Ann Hronek
65W–44L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 10 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Stephanie Tagge
11W–24L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Lindsey Ramage
186W–128L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Angie Neuberger
73W–76L career · 3 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56
Nicole Mills
88W–75L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Kathy Vicars
22W–25L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
Katri Koehle
84W–81L career · 7 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Samantha Berg
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Gail Levee
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.88
Marian Christensen
32W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.