Teams

Davis/Goy 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-09vs Flanagan 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Lancaster / Blythe Murphy vs Reeves Rhoten / Annetta Bartle6-1, 6-4
2024-09-18vs Bodine/Lane 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesGina Goy / Blythe Murphy vs Erin Bodine / Jessica Baker4-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs Yates C 18s 6.5 Combo Wed PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesGina Goy / Blythe Murphy vs Casey Emmendorfer / Lauren Haldeman6-1, 1-1
2024-08-07vs Dagger 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Franz / Blythe Murphy vs Janet Howard / Courtney Dagger6-4, 6-4
2024-07-31vs Yates J. 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Goy / Blythe Murphy vs LaJean Morrow Smith / Kelly Guyler6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.50
Gina Goy
published
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
published
3.45
Karrah Durham
published
3.37
Blythe Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.31
Thais Warwar
published
3.28
Melissa Gujrati
published
3.27
Audrey Snyder
published 3.5
3.19
Samantha Price
published
3.06
Shannon Sandifer
published
3.00
Katie Bir
published
2.92
Jordan Allison
published
2.65
Catherine Davis
published 3
Kimberly Lancaster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Price + Thais Warwar6550% games+4.4% vs expected
Kimberly Halsey + Kimberly Franz8358% games+0.1% vs expected
Blythe Murphy + Thais Warwar314 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Price + Karrah Durham314 matchesnot enough data
Katie Bir + Shannon Sandifer213 matchesnot enough data
Thais Warwar + Karrah Durham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
57W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Karrah Durham
25W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Thais Warwar
29W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Melissa Gujrati
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Audrey Snyder
35W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Samantha Price
22W–26L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
Shannon Sandifer
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Katie Bir
27W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Jordan Allison
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Catherine Davis
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
2.65
Kimberly Lancaster
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.