Search

Stacie Katahara

Lake Forest Park, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
33 matches · 11W–22L · seasons 20202024
Where Stacie sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Stacie is one of 1702 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 68% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacie has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5202020232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Stacie has gone from the 32nd to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
33.3%
11W–22L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
L
2024-08-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
0.001below expectation — took 14% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Liang Ming Chen / Nichelle Song
2024-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Maurer
0.031below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
0.007about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Maurer
0.014below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Clark
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-05-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Treasa Sweek
+0.017better than expected — took 47% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Margaret Pulvermann / Jeannie Pae
2024-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Clark
0.008below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bridget Charters
+0.030better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marni Klein
0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hong Vo
0.017about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Hundt
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.