← Search

Cindy Nunn

Anchorage, AK
0.0 year-end
56 matches · 25W–31L · seasons 2021–2022
Where Cindy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Cindy is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cindy has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 60.3% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.2% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 31.9% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 34.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
2022-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Donna Newman
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 3-2
W
Lu Ruan / Shu Scottmixedchamps
2022-08-12 · #2 Doubles · with Donna Newman
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Newman
−0.007about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2022-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Newman
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Knapp
+0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
April Korshin / Christine Fagerstrom
2022-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucille Abe
−0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2022-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Knapp
+0.003better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Bette Belanger / Jennifer Duclos
2022-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Newman
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Elison
+0.003better than expected — took 86% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Knapp
+0.001about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Brooks
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Christine Fagerstrom / Phu Ngomixed
2022-02-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Preecha Pongphai
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.