← Search

Martha DuHamel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 10W–22L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history32 matches
L
2024-06-12 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Noel Angell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-06-07 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christina Krashan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-31 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Murakami
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-10 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Danoff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-04-17 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Price
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-05-31 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Berlin
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-05-02 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Sneed
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-29 · AYTC-Flounders-Newgord · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-04-23 · AYTC-Flounders-Newgord · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Heywood
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-12 · TCSP-Super 65's-Lull · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandy Berlin
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-04-07 · AYTC-Flounders-Newgord · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Florence Kim
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-01 · AYTC-Flounders-Newgord · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Youngji Kim
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
20%
4W–16L · 33.6% of games
6.0
50%
6W–6L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#2 Singles
16%
5 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe