← Search

Nathalie Robert

Newcastle, WA
0.0 year-end
39 matches · 18W–21L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Nathalie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Nathalie is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nathalie has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Nathalie has gone from the 44th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history39 matches
L
2022-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Kim
−0.063below expectation — took 20% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mutsumi Locklear
−0.020below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mutsumi Locklear
+0.010better than expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2022-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aline Pereira
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2022-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Waller
−0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2022-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Cockreham
−0.067about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Brandy Nakada / Julie DeCamp
2022-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Gonzalez
−0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2022-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Gonzalez
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Leel Scarlet Griot / Lori Nehls
2022-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Gonzalez
−0.015below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristi Gonzalez
+0.018better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Hillyer
−0.019below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Andrea Maison / Kristin Kent
2021-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aline Pereira
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.