Search

Leel Scarlet Griot

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
33 matches · 17W–16L · seasons 20192024
Where Leel sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Leel is one of 1076 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 90% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leel has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Leel has gone from the 57th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history33 matches
W
N/A
2024-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krystine Rivera-Hollinger
0.058about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Alexis Choy / Teri Johnson
2024-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandy Nakada
+0.050better than expected — took 62% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2024-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Kim
0.054below expectation — took 25% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Barbara Wyatt / Theresa Smith
2023-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Esther Kim
0.039below expectation — took 57% of games against 69% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Gallagher
+0.012about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandy Nakada
0.014about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Mcnaughton
0.021below expectation — took 52% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Lomax
+0.039better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2023-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alana Wade
0.085below expectation — took 59% of games against 87% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2022-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Esther Kim
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-08-12 · #3 Doubles · with Alana Wade
0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Smith
0.038below expectation — took 38% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.