← Search

Brenda Fournier

HAYDEN, ID
0.0 year-end
44 matches · 15W–29L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Brenda sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Brenda is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brenda has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Brenda has gone from the 16th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
22.2%
6W–21L · 41.1% of games
6.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
L
Meghan Gourley / Jennie Warren
2023-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Selemon
+0.001about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
2023-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Selemon
+0.021better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jo Leonardson
−0.023below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger
+0.001about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2022-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger
+0.078better than expected — took 80% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Susan Louie / Yuriko Rosnow
2022-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sally Linebarger
−0.027below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Stephanie Shi / Sherry Yang
2022-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Weiser
+0.053better than expected — took 59% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Julie Martin / Elizabeth Pauldine
2022-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Sharp
−0.060below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Gail Richards / Carly Kaufman
2022-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Vuong
−0.008about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wakefield
+0.018better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Marlita Bang / Danica Knievel
2022-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jo Leonardson
−0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Sonya Elliott / Arlene Flor
2022-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Vuong
−0.002about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.