← Search

Angie Aggen

Seattle, WA
0.0 year-end
70 matches · 33W–37L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Angie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Angie is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Angie has been 4.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Angie has gone from the 96th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.4% of games
4.5
28%
7W–18L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 43.1% of games
9.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
W
Heather Tucker / Yuka Kimura
2021-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Annie Knudson
+0.095better than expected — took 75% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2021-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Addicott
−0.006about as expected — took 36% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 1-1
W
2021-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Moriarty
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-0
W
2021-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mckenny
−0.007about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-5
W
Angela Taylor / Kelly Edwardschamps
2021-05-01 · #3 Doubles · with Kimberly Sahlin
+0.013better than expected — took 58% of games against 51% expected
6-7, 5-1
W
2021-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Sahlin
−0.026below expectation — took 53% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 3-3
L
2021-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Taylor
−0.012below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2021-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Jones
+0.075better than expected — took 53% of games against 30% expected
7-5, 3-4
W
Kimberly Skorupa / Melanie Ludick
2021-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina la Porta
+0.058better than expected — took 71% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2021-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Sahlin
+0.011about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Mike Wilson / Archana Kumarmixed
2020-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian MacDuff
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Travis Roach / Kendra Hanmixed
2020-10-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Auriemma
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.