← Search

Alicia Scott

Kirkland, WA
0.0 year-end
79 matches · 56W–23L · seasons 2019–2022
Where Alicia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Alicia is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alicia has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Alicia has gone from the 78th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
85.1%
40W–7L · 59.8% of games
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
W
2022-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Cagle
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Camilla George / Debbie MacNary
2022-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Caponigro
+0.015about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Waters
−0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Caitlin Doucette / Lexie Miller
2022-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wheeler
−0.017below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2022-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wheeler
−0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wheeler
−0.026below expectation — took 8% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wheeler
+0.109better than expected — took 100% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Christine Acarregui / Jennifer Droppelman
2022-01-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wheeler
+0.033better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Wheeler
−0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Johan Froneman / Liana Profferchamps
2021-11-06 · #3 Doubles · with Jeetu Thakur
−0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/Amixed
2021-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacob Mann
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2021-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Chao
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.