Search

Thor Deacon

HENDERSON, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
75 matches · 36W–39L · seasons 20192025
Where Thor sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Thor is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams37 teams · 2014–2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC
2025 Nta Adult Fall League · 4.0 MEN
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC
2025 Usta Adult League 40 & Over · 4.0 MEN- 40 & OVER
2025
NV/STRASSER/ADULT40&OVER/M3.5
2025 Usta Adult League 40 & Over · 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER
2025
DRAGONRIDGE CC
2025 Usta Adult League 18 & Over · 3.5 MEN- 18 & OVER
2025
DTC #3
2025 Usta Mixed League 18 & Over · MIXED 8.0- 18 & OVER
2025
DTC #4
2025 Nta Summer League · 4.0 MEN
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thor has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520192022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Thor has gone from the 46th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
53.5%
23W–20L · 54.3% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 45.6% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
L
YuCheng Chen / Luis Almanzar
2025-07-31 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Silversmith
+0.058better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
1-3
W
2025-07-22 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Tam Vu
0.011about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Michael Miller / PASHA RAFAT
2025-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ren Lopez
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Dan Michalski / David Leibner
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Weaver
+0.060better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Brad Davis / Tyler Mccoy
2025-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ren Lopez
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Tom Mullin / Jacqueline Robertsmixed
2025-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Wu
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Gary Miller / Adam Miller
2025-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ren Lopez
0.022below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ren Lopez
0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-03-16 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Wu
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
James Mcclary / Eric Mattson
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ren Lopez
+0.012better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Jason MacDonald / Kevin McPartlin
2025-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Efstathios Potamitis
+0.019better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Rajeev Sharma / Kandarp Bhatt
2025-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Ng
0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.