Search

Jennifer Fei

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
49 matches · 29W–20L · seasons 20192024
Where Jennifer sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jennifer is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jennifer has gone from the 16th to the 34th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 64% of games
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 42.7% of games
7.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Judy Orlandini / Lisa Cohns
2023-09-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susie Garland
+0.008about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Swathi Karlapati / Kate Schramm
2023-02-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeny Joseph
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2022-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Ariosa
+0.009better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeny Joseph
+0.041better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-09-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Swift
+0.024better than expected — took 62% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2022-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Cassin
+0.010about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Ariosa
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2022-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Jesse
+0.026better than expected — took 41% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Funkhouser
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gina Ariosa
+0.030better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2021-12-04 · #2 Doubles · with Gina Ariosa
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Janice Thomas / Susan Judge
2021-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Ariosa
+0.034better than expected — took 59% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.