Search

Peter Brandenburger

Portland, OR
0.0 year-end
41 matches · 21W–20L · seasons 20192022
Where Peter sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Peter is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams21 teams · 2015–2022
SAC-Marsh(s)
2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2022
SAC-Majmudar/Marsh
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
SAC-Marsh
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2020
SAC-Frasier/Vu
2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2019
SAC-Brandenburger/Legassick
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men
2019
SAC-Frasier/Vu
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Peter has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Peter has gone from the 48th to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 60.1% of games
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
L
2022-05-14 · SAC-Majmudar/Marsh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Marsh
0.027below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jennifer Potter / Kok Waii Wongmixed
2021-10-23 · SAC-Marsh(s) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Fernstrom
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2021-10-03 · SAC-Marsh(s) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Brandenburger
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2020-02-29 · SAC-Marsh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Marsh
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2020-02-23 · SAC-Marsh · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2020-02-15 · SAC-Marsh · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharad Tripathi
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Edward Fu / NANDA SIDDAIAH
2020-02-08 · SAC-Marsh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajan Madhusudan
+0.041better than expected — took 56% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Shane Kim / Michael Lee
2020-01-17 · SAC-Marsh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Aman
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2020-01-04 · SAC-Marsh · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.025better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Andrew Apter
2019-06-30 · SAC-Brandenburger/Legassick · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.029below expectation — took 65% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2019-06-29 · SAC-Frasier/Vu · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Gilbertson
0.017below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Page Watts
2019-06-23 · SAC-Brandenburger/Legassick · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.