Search

Maria Henriksen-Marks

Snohomish, WA
0.0 year-end
56 matches · 24W–32L · seasons 20192022
Where Maria sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Maria is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maria has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Maria has gone from the 25th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
32%
8W–17L · 48.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.7% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 48.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history56 matches
L
Tina Nef / Trisna Tanus
2022-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mei Yang
0.001about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jaye Siqueiros / Genevieve Tremblay
2022-01-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Murray
0.014about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Murray
0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2021-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Weyer
0.002better than expected — took 100% of games against 84% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-11-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Marks
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2021-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelly Finn
0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Elaine Hoy / Er-Jia Maomixed
2021-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Marks
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2021-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Hofmann
0.007about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2021-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Hofmann
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2021-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Marks
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-08-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Daniels
+0.041better than expected — took 80% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Richard Marcou / Sarah Leclercqmixed
2021-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tim Marks
+0.000about as expected — took 65% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.