Search

Patries Ferguson

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
60 matches · 29W–31L · seasons 20192024
Where Patries sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Patries is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams27 teams · 2016–2024
MAC-Bigley/Ferguson
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2024
MAC-Ferguson/Bigley
2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2024
MAC-Bigley/Ferguson
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2023
MAC-Ferguson/Bigley
2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2023
MAC-Bigley/Ferguson
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2023
MAC-Ferguson/Bigley
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Patries has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Patries has gone from the 80th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
64.3%
27W–15L · 57.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 24.7% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 31.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2024-06-21 · MAC-Ferguson/Bigley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.053better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Kerry Blake / Sarah Cariaga
2024-02-24 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.052below expectation — took 41% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-02-16 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.041better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-01-06 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.079below expectation — took 47% of games against 71% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Sarah Larson / Teufelin Traylen
2023-05-19 · MAC-Ferguson/Bigley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-14 · MAC-Ferguson/Bigley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Sturm
0.005better than expected — took 86% of games against 75% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Ashley Sajadi / Christina Hancock
2023-04-15 · MAC-Ferguson/Bigley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Darcy Reardon / MICHELLE LY
2023-02-25 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-02-05 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.012about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-28 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.024below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-11-20 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Gram
0.042below expectation — took 61% of games against 73% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-09-25 · MAC-Bigley/Ferguson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Gram
+0.002about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.