David Visse
Tualatin, OR
42 matches · 16W–26L · seasons 2019–2025
Captains: add David Visse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history42 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2016–2025
SHC-Christensen
SHC-Lumetta
SHC-Dehoog/Putnam
SHC-Gettle
SHC-Gettle
SHC-Mayer/Wendling
SHC-Mayer
SHC-Mayer/Siebers
SHC-Pacioni
SHC-Tracy
SHC-Visse
SHC-Finley
SHC-Hyde/Finley
SHC-Hyde/Finley
SHC-Visse
LOTC-Hilden/Henry
Mayer/Tracy
SHC-Schmidt
SHC-Schmidt/Metke
SHC-Mayer/Schmidt
SHC-McLaughlin
SHC-Schmidt
SHC-Moore
SHC-Moore/Visse
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 42.3% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 56.8% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.