Search

Deanna Phillips

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
50 matches · 32W–18L · seasons 20192026
Where Deanna sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Deanna is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deanna has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Deanna has gone from the 20th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
63.2%
24W–14L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
W
Carrie Jones / Alyson Battistel
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Ayotte
+0.021better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Hisatomi
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Betty Koon / JEAN CHEN
2025-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cupper
+0.036better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Phillips
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-09-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Phillips
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Shields
0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Lisa Johnston-Smith / Melissa Lanceta
2024-04-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Ayotte
0.016about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Hailey Straube / Sarah Schill
2024-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
0.046below expectation — took 71% of games against 80% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-02-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cupper
0.009about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Hisatomi
0.014below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.