Heidi Sung
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MD
400 matches · 313W–87L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history400 matches
Teams91 teams · 2019–2023
Batkins/Lee
Eve of Destruction 18+ 9.0
‘23 & LEE 18+ 8.0
4-hands, BATKINS & Vol-Lees 4.0
4-hands, BATKINS & vol-LEEs 4.0
Baynard
Bring’n The Spice 18+
Bring’n The Spice 40+
Chaisson/Dietz
Chick-Fil-8.5
Hume
I'd Hit That
JesShady 8.5
Jess 7.0 40+
Jess Bumped Up 40+
Lee 9.0
Lee/Dao 8.5 Mixed Combo
Mid Court Crisis
Mid Court Crisis 40+
MoCOva
MoCady 8.0 40+
MoCo Cady 8.5 Mixed
Park 8.0
Seoul Mates 7.5
Shankopotamus
Team Lee 3.0-4.0
Team Vinnie
Vissernetts 40+
Wok in the Park
Akcam
Big Sac Sac
Bring'n The Spice (40+)
Cha Cha Crawl
Cha Fred 8.0
Coe/Hazel
HighLee Adicted
Hold My Calls
Jess Do It 8.0 (40+)
Jess Do it 8.0
Just For Tennis Fun
LEEthal Combo 7.5
League of Our Own III
Leitzer
MacAttack 3.5 (40+)
MacAttack 3.5 18+
MacDonald
Mixed Park
Park After Dark
Sac Sac
Seoul Mates
Speirs
Team 1 High Rollers
Tennis Fun
The Fugees
The Fugees (40+)
07 July Refunds 2
09 September Refunds 2
8.0 Cady Frederick
Beyzline
Big Sac Sac (Lee)
Game Time
Gill
High Rollers -Johnson
HighLee Addicted (Jessica)
Jess Do It 8.0
LEEgue of Our Own 2
MacAttack 3.5
Norin/Hodges
Sac Sac (Lee)
SacSac
Team 1 High Rollers
The Bitter Half
The Bitter Half
The Fugees
Worldly
Zuiderhof
Zuiderhof
gangLEE
Court Order 3.5
D-Leary-Us-Lee Addicted
Fishkind
Gesell
Gesell
Gill
Kim 40+
Mixed Park
Sac Sac
Say My Name
Smashing Divas
The Destroyers
The Fugees
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level22 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 55.7% of games
3.0
89.7%
26W–3L · 70.4% of games
3.5
78.6%
55W–15L · 60.9% of games
4.0
62%
31W–19L · 55.4% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.5% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 66.4% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
12W–0L · 74.1% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
79.3%
46W–12L · 62.5% of games
7.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
72.1%
44W–17L · 57% of games
8.5mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 59.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
135 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
103 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
101 matches
#1 Singles
6%
25 matches
Singles
6%
25 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.