← Search

Jane Repensek

Camano Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
130 matches · 72W–58L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Jane sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Jane is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jane has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jane has gone from the 13th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.7% of games
3.0
51.5%
35W–33L · 49.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 9.4% of games
6.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 54.2% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history130 matches
L
Lauren Anderson / Leigha Grimaldi
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara White
−0.055below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
2-1
W
Xinlu Tu / Elaine Wang
2025-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
+0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Laura Borner / Upasna Suman
2025-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
−0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Karen Hayward / Susan van Meter
2025-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Schrock
−0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Laura Kirkland / Carolyn Bardon
2025-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisse Priskila
−0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Eileen Lu
2025-04-26 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Nicole Evans
2025-04-12 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.081below expectation — took 8% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisse Priskila
+0.028better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Donna Lou / Angela Patterson
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisse Priskila
+0.009better than expected — took 62% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-03-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
−0.034below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Asha DSouza / Erin Park
2025-03-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
+0.016better than expected — took 68% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.