← Search

Tina Felps

SAN DIEGO, CA
0.0 year-end
79 matches · 39W–40L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Tina sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Tina is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tina has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tina has gone from the 43rd to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.6% of games
4.0
37.1%
13W–22L · 42.2% of games
7.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 75.1% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 26.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
2021-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Dye
−0.009below expectation — took 32% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2021-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
−0.015below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Michelle Alber / Julie Sanford-Wible
2021-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Nienhuis
−0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2021-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yae Matsuishi
+0.001better than expected — took 86% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2021-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabine Curtis
−0.054below expectation — took 44% of games against 67% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Leslee Collins / Marcela Urcia
2021-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.006better than expected — took 72% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Sladana Radonic / Rosemary Turner
2021-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Christensen
+0.025better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2021-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2021-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Penrose
−0.066below expectation — took 35% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2021-03-18 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
−0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2021-03-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Christensen
−0.044below expectation — took 45% of games against 62% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.053better than expected — took 92% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.