Search

Ruth Jacobson

Mercer Island, WA
0.0 year-end
45 matches · 18W–27L · seasons 20192023
Where Ruth sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Ruth is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ruth has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Ruth has gone from the 25th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 40% of games
7.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history45 matches
L
2023-08-20 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Suzanne Dodd
0.013below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Esther Gladson / Susan Walker
2023-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Nancy Arnold
+0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Lia Morrison / Monika Ries
2023-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Nancy A Smith
0.035below expectation — took 42% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Arnold
+0.022better than expected — took 54% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Janice Malos / Lynda Carlson
2023-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Arnold
+0.014better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Debra Egge / Ann Rae Smith
2021-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Bremner
0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy A Smith
0.051below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2020-02-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emer Hensey
0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2020-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Sedlacek
+0.030better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2020-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hanayo Gage
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2020-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Roehrs
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2020-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Carson
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.