← Search

Susie Harrington

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mercer Island, WA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 7W–5L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-05-05 · MI-Golden Aces-Demuth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dena Mulberg
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-22 · MI-Golden Aces-Demuth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Panteleakos
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-05-29 · MI-Golden Aces-Demuth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Kaestle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-05-12 · MI-Golden Aces-Demuth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marian Sinkey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-08-03 · MI-Lin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Naden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-07-28 · MI-Lin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Naden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-06-22 · MI-Lin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Naden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-06-15 · MI-Lin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Naden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2019-01-26 · MI-Gurney · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Martin
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2018-10-27 · MI-Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Jacobson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2018-09-28 · MI-Smith · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Jacobson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2018-09-22 · MI-Govier · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kitty Flaherty
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 44.1% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova