Search

Steven Curtis

Bainbridge Island, WA
4.0S year-end 2025
69 matches · 19W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bainbridge Island · 4.0
7 of 12
WA · 4.0
479 of 782

Steven is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Steven has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Steven has gone from the 53rd to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 47.1% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 36.9% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
17.4%
4W–19L · 44.4% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
Peter Wachter / David Gravenkemper
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ferguson
0.034below expectation — took 35% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-11-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ferguson
0.042about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
George Bond / Bob Wyda
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Im
0.033below expectation — took 42% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 4-3
L
Chris Barry / Robert Moline
2024-10-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Crowley
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-10-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Crowley
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
N/A
2022-09-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Chinn
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-0
L
Mark Walker / Thomas Jordanchamps
2022-06-25 · #2 Doubles · with James Ferguson
+0.006about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
Kevin Tweed / John Williamschamps
2022-06-24 · #3 Doubles · with Richard Alaniz
0.041below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-06-24 · #2 Doubles · with Steve Hutchins
0.022below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Sonny Lim / Kevin Kang
2022-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Beal
+0.009about as expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Steve Churchill / Manato Hirai
2022-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Rabinowitz
+0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Hall
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.