← Search

Lyn Matson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 28W–17L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history45 matches
L
2024-06-07 · VAC-Finn/Stern-Senioritas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Cockrell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-30 · VAC-Finn/Stern-Senioritas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Cockrell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-24 · VAC-Finn/Stern-Senioritas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Stern
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-05 · VAC-Finn-Senioritas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Case
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-03-22 · CV-Deep Canyon/Gohd & Matson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Mitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
W
2023-02-09 · LLW-CV-Willsey · #4 Doubles · with Cheri Wulf
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-02-01 · CV-Deep Canyon/Gohd & Matson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Mitchell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-01-19 · LLW-CV-Willsey · #3 Doubles · with Loretta Gohd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2023-01-12 · LLW-CV-Willsey · #3 Doubles · with Loretta Gohd
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2022-05-13 · VAC-Finn/Stern Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mazikowski
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-05-12 · VAC-Finn/Stern Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Mazikowski
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2022-03-02 · CV-Deep Canyon/L Matson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emily Cockrell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#5 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams