Teams

High Point/Tucker-Wise-Itscovitch W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-26vs McKinney/Colston-Bowersox W3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesTanya Ford / Deganit Gal vs Shera Cameron / Mary Yearous6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCeleste Schmidt vs Irene Weaver5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Graham / Hilary Nagel vs Heather Pereira / Cathy Raney2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuth Robbins / Kirsten Kirlin vs Tori Schoen / Doreen McDonnell6-1, 6-0
2025-06-19vs Stonebriar/Anderson-Buster W3.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesDeganit Gal / Hilary Nagel vs Cynthia Bunch / Donna Bickerstaff7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Kilmer vs Annie Rohde6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCindy Graham / Kirsten Kirlin vs Amy Baker / Katherine Barsch6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTara Glotzbach vs Sandee Anderson7-6, 6-3
2025-06-05vs Seay/Goelzer W3.5Won 41
W#1 DoublesDeganit Gal / Tricia Ehrisman vs Halie Overton / Katie Campbell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCeleste Schmidt vs Karla Baumgartner6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShari Nederhoff / Kelly Lilley vs Lindsey Wilson / Leigh Anne Haugh0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTara Glotzbach vs Katie Cathcart6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Tucker / Katie Kilmer vs Mary Jane Hanna / Carolyn Goelzer6-2, 6-1
2025-05-29Won 20
W#1 DoublesDeganit Gal / Tanya Ford vs Jacquelyn Lewis / Dana Maksimovich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCeleste Schmidt vs Julia Cisneros6-1, 6-4
2025-05-22vs Greenhill/Thornton-Hark W3.5Lost 23
L#1 DoublesDeganit Gal / Chelsea Northam vs Amanda Forrest / Erin Baldwin3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCeleste Schmidt vs Stephanie Shah2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTricia Ehrisman / Hilary Nagel vs Jackie Fogle / Lynn Johnson6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKatie Kilmer vs Keri Anderson6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary Tucker / Tanya Ford vs Linda Potts / Claudine Vazquez4-6, 4-6
2025-05-15vs DAC/Starnes-Willson W3.5Lost 05
L#1 DoublesTricia Ehrisman / Tanya Ford vs Jessie Williams / Jennifer Willson4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCeleste Schmidt vs Lindsey Starnes2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShari Nederhoff / Chelsea Northam vs Sandy Debusk / Denise Race6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTara Glotzbach vs Leigh Ann Griffin0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Kirlin / Mary Tucker vs Shannon DeVilbiss / Julie Ann Forbes2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-12vs DCC/Slaven W3.5Lost 14
W#1 DoublesCeleste Schmidt / Tricia Ehrisman vs Blair Heartfield / Jessica Slaven1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTara Glotzbach vs Jennifer Coats2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRuth Robbins / Tanya Ford vs Christine Danuser / Molly Fernandes5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKatie Kilmer vs Jordan Pounds1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Northam / Kirsten Kirlin vs Adelaide Skinner / Genny Montgomery4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-08Split 22
L#1 DoublesTricia Ehrisman / Ruth Robbins vs Amy Robles / April Scopa2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Kilmer vs Sara Wadlington3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Lilley / Hilary Nagel vs Lisa Cunov / Angela Ware6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTara Glotzbach / Kirsten Kirlin vs Vanessa Bosworth / Holly Stroud6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings29 teams · S W. Thursday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chandlers Landing/Oelke-Lee W3.58035517234
2DCC/Slaven W3.580301024237
3Northwood/Pask W3.57133720248
4The Nelson/Stoll-Wood W3.571301030319
5Lakes @ Castle Hills/Lewis-Boronski W3.5 (F2025 WC)71261436322
6Samuell Grand/Nicholson-Carpenter W3.571251542371
7DAC/Starnes-Willson W3.562291126279
8Lakes/Akbany-Little W3.562251533302
9RGAC/Lucas W3.553231739322
10McKinney/Hedblom W3.553251540334
11Lakes/Leeper-Bingham W3.553241641369
12Brook Hollow/Stephenson W3.544211943359
13El Dorado/Miller W3.544202044348
14Fretz/Buechel W3.544182249380
15Stonebridge/Giacchino-Cantu W3.544202050391
16Garland/Howarth-Grandle W3.535192146348
17High Point/Tucker-Wise-Itscovitch W3.535202048350
18High Point/Escutia W3.535182249370
19Bent Tree/Sarché-Wilder W3.535152552400
20Gleneagles/Steyn-Priebe W3.535162453400
21T bar M/Mizerany-Benson W3.535142657403
22DAC/Frazure-Shepardson W3.535122860409
23Royal Oaks/Copley W.526202043366
24Las Colinas/Demarque W3.526152553388
25McKinney/Griffiths-Sullivan W3.526132759407
26SpringPark/Eubank-Middlebrook W3.517103065420
27Brookhaven/Frenkel-Smercina W3.508112961411
28Canyon Creek/Cotter-Allen W3.508112962436
29Lakewood/Cholerton-Tucker W3.50873368439

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
3.33
Deganit Gal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Hilary Nagel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Katie Kilmer
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.27
Tricia Ehrisman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Kirsten Kirlin
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Tara Glotzbach
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.17
Chelsea Northam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.13
Celeste Schmidt
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Shari Nederhoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Cindy Graham
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.07
Kelly Lilley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ruth Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Tanya Ford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Ehrisman + Deganit Gal9656% games+7.6% vs expected
Kirsten Kirlin + Ruth Robbins3450% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Kirlin + MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH2447% gamesnot enough data
Celeste Schmidt + Tricia Ehrisman314 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Kirlin + Tara Glotzbach224 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Ford + Deganit Gal213 matchesnot enough data
Celeste Schmidt + Deganit Gal123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lilley + Shari Nederhoff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MARNI WISE - ITSCOVITCH
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Deganit Gal
22W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Hilary Nagel
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Katie Kilmer
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Tricia Ehrisman
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Kirsten Kirlin
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Tara Glotzbach
11W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Chelsea Northam
39W–20L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
3.5
Celeste Schmidt
19W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Shari Nederhoff
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cindy Graham
34W–23L career · 11 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
Kelly Lilley
27W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Ruth Robbins
11W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Ford
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.