Teams

EDG-Terminetters-Debiec

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-01vs RBW-Kay/GutierrezWon 32
W#1 DoublesAngie Moawad / Jackie Vandenberg vs Kaila Yun / Cristina Borsan6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmy Hsu vs Yixuan Yang3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Debiec / Marie Michigami vs Beth Berris / Elynn Wu0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Dillinger vs Yimeng Song6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGreta Dedmon / Rachael Mitchell vs Vaiana Guittet / Shreya Singh6-4, 6-3
2025-05-24vs NTC-Porter KreskenLost 14
L#1 DoublesJackie Vandenberg / Bridget Allen vs Leshya Wig / Heidi Sutter6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dillinger vs Dora Varsa1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Michigami / Teena Griggs vs Karen Baebler / Michelle Leonatti6-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRenee Waltz vs Chen-Yi Chou6-4, 5-3
L#3 DoublesRachael Mitchell / Mary Hougan vs Gillianne Beyer / Anne Corsano2-6, 4-6
2025-05-16vs NWW-HBSQ-RutterLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Debiec / Marie Michigami vs Heather Morrow / Crystal Vo4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Hsu vs Nicole Bouche6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeena Griggs / Angie Moawad vs Sarah Newman / MacKenzie Wilkins7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRachael Mitchell vs Anya Dalkin1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Chan / Mary Hougan vs Megan Huffman / Lauren Rutter1-6, 5-7
2025-05-03vs NTC-Porter KreskenLost 14
L#1 DoublesAngie Moawad / Jackie Vandenberg vs Kirsi Varsa / Heidi Sutter3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGabriela Defrancisci vs Dora Varsa0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Chan / Renee Waltz vs Deborah Wilson / Elizabeth Gorey1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Hsu vs Eryn Muetzel6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKyoko Imai / Greta Dedmon vs Lindy Irving / Gillianne Beyer3-6, 2-6
2025-04-27vs BETC-WallaceLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Debiec / Amy Hsu vs Sachiko Ishihara-Spray / Jill Casale2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Chan vs Anna Zhang4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJackie Vandenberg / Teena Griggs vs Reva Wallace / Angela Byrum6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRenee Waltz vs Kristin Gallagher6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAngie Moawad / Mary Hougan vs Aline Pereira / Kay Lorrain6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-18vs AYTC-HoodLost 05
L#1 DoublesBridget Allen / Elizabeth Dillinger vs Connie Cai / Katie Lai1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Waltz vs Nicole Forbord7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJackie Vandenberg / Nancy Chan vs Kim Hood / Tami Davis6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMary Hougan vs Emily Pelosi0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKyoko Imai / Greta Dedmon vs Molly Hunter / Julie Swets6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs CP-McSunLost 14
W#1 DoublesBridget Allen / Jackie Vandenberg vs Katie McRoberts / Holly Yang6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRuchita Shetty vs Kylie Choi4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreta Dedmon / Kyoko Imai vs Laurie Ono / Kristina Edmonson4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRenee Waltz vs Pia Westen0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Chan / Elizabeth Dillinger vs Michelle Neal / Akiko Suzuki6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-30vs RBW-Kay/GutierrezWon 32
W#1 DoublesBridget Allen / Jackie Vandenberg vs Cristina Gutierrez / Mindy Richardson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dillinger vs Beth Berris3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Debiec / Marie Michigami vs Kim Evans / Carola Dopps1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGabriela Defrancisci vs Felicia van Pelt6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeena Griggs / Nancy Chan vs Liza Skorupski / Abby Harrison6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BELL-Sets in the City-Baker80291126257
2AYTC-Hood80291134317
3NWW-AYTC-Osborn71301027282
4NWW-HBSQ-Rutter71261433302
5NTC-Porter Kresken53241636317
6NTC-SBV-Lao53231737321
7MI-Net Cords Nemesis-Jawed35192148364
8AYTC-Jefferson Park Racquet Club-Miller35182249393
9CP-McSun35192150384
10BETC-Wallace26162456403
11EDG-Terminetters-Debiec26112960429
12STC-The Holmes Team26122860416
13RBW-Kay/Gutierrez17152554380
14TCSP-Fletcher0893162426

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Bridget Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Teena Griggs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Ruchita Shetty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Jackie Vandenberg
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.17
Marie Michigami
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.08
Angie Moawad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.03
Gabriela Defrancisci
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Amy Hsu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.98
Elizabeth Dillinger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.89
Nancy Chan
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.88
Lisa Debiec
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Rachael Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.85
Mary Hougan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.73
Renee Waltz
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #1 Singles 24% · published 4
3.72
Greta Dedmon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.70
Kyoko Imai
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greta Dedmon + Nancy Chan6064% games+14.9% vs expected
Angie Moawad + Jackie Vandenberg3249% games+8.5% vs expected
Renee Waltz + Nancy Chan6261% games+7.2% vs expected
Rachael Mitchell + Lisa Debiec1442% games+4.4% vs expected
Jackie Vandenberg + Teena Griggs21758% games+2.3% vs expected
Bridget Allen + Jackie Vandenberg221059% games+1.8% vs expected
Greta Dedmon + Kyoko Imai192348% games−2.9% vs expected
Angie Moawad + Nancy Chan4445% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bridget Allen
73W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Teena Griggs
86W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Ruchita Shetty
31W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Jackie Vandenberg
202W–108L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Marie Michigami
146W–102L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Angie Moawad
51W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Gabriela Defrancisci
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Amy Hsu
28W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Elizabeth Dillinger
15W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.98
4
Nancy Chan
189W–135L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Lisa Debiec
59W–151L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Rachael Mitchell
51W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Mary Hougan
33W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Renee Waltz
124W–92L career · 17 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Greta Dedmon
77W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Kyoko Imai
80W–76L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.