← Teams

NTC-Love ‘Em and Leave ‘Em-Zimbelman

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-11vs AYTC-Lov'n D'Aces-PadillaLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChardie Byrne / Katie Jergens vs Lori Beehner / Jenni Cox2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCecilia Moens / Angela Graham vs Karen Kelly / Suzanne Lasser4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Lou / Lisa Muzzy vs Emily Ishado / Cynthia Padilla5-7, 4-6
2022-03-05vs RBW-BigMacs-McAllenLost 1–2
W#1 DoublesBrooke Gilbert / Chardie Byrne vs Anca Popoaei / Dana Brad6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanice Merlino / Amy Zimbelman vs Joanne Bastian / Elaine McCall3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusie Bunker / Sue Thompson vs Nicky Razwick / Heidi Hollyhead0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-13vs BAIN-WigginsWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Zimbelman / Jamie Williams vs Erica Wiechers / Eleanor Gray6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Jolly / Sue Thompson vs Aileen Bergstrom / Jackie Osland4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Graham / Katie Jergens vs Stephanie Viele / Lisa Wiggins7-5, 5-2
2022-02-06vs STC-BlanchfieldLost 0–4
L#1 DoublesChardie Byrne / Brooke Gilbert vs Sarah McKinney / Cassandra Johnston6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Graham vs Tysen Gannon2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJamie Williams / Tracy Jolly vs EJ Blanchfield / Melanie Kosloff2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Jergens / Janice Merlino vs Kieran Oaksmith / Chelsea Schanno7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-05vs ETC-LampittLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAmy Zimbelman / Jamie Williams vs Jamie Lampitt / Alyssa Grundmeyer6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSherri Wolson / Lisa Muzzy vs Heather Shoultz / Katherine Crews2-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Graham / Mandy Levenberg vs Andrea Lang / Pam MacDuff7-6, 6-4
2022-01-29vs CAC/SL-Smart Aces-McGoldrickWon 4–0
W#1 DoublesBrooke Gilbert / Jamie Williams vs Leita Garside / Colleen Hanson6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCecilia Moens vs Margaret Daniels6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherri Wolson / Lisa Muzzy vs Julie McGoldrick / Teresa King7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Curtis / Sue Thompson vs Carolyn Smith / Marie Fahey6-3, 6-4
2022-01-21vs FC-Tenacious-MarLost 1–2
W#1 DoublesBrooke Gilbert / Chardie Byrne vs Anita Marrero / Medilyn Barrett6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTracy Jolly / Amy Zimbelman vs Dao Kelly / Carrie Wies4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Curtis / Lisa Muzzy vs Yasmeen Mar / Angela Cummings1-6, 3-6
2022-01-15vs HBSQ-Vitco/ClarkWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Zimbelman / Jamie Williams vs Vicki Clark / Carol Rea6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCecilia Moens / Angela Graham vs Fran Joy / Barbara Kristek6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Curtis / Sue Thompson vs Pauline Lane / Carrie Wallace6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-08vs BETC-MansfieldWon 3–0
W#1 DoublesCecilia Moens / Sherri Wolson vs Anne Salvino / Sheri Borden6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChardie Byrne / Tracy Jolly vs Que-Phuong Tran / Pamela Yorozu7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Merlino / Katie Jergens vs Izumi Sullivan / Kumiko Kamplaine6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PSC-Zhang/Olano90251122237
2BC-Clemente 3.5W8025722225
3AYTC-Ballers-Niset81251128283
4RBW-BigMacs-McAllen81241229275
5NTC-Shake and Bake-Solimano7228821275
6FC-Tenacious-Mar72251128268
7TCSP-Tennisanity-Golden72221430273
8EDG-Las Chiquitas-Kainz62211125250
9NTC-Simply Smashing! Vecchio/Miller6223927247
10CAC/SL-Wanat 3.5W62201230253
11MI-Goodman 3.5W63221436317
12CP-Garnett54211534303
13CP-Rally Cats-Bauer54191738332
14ETC-Vail54221440324
15HBSQ-Burdyshaw54181840312
16RBW-Rasanen54181841344
17ETC-Vo44151744309
18NTC-Love ‘Em and Leave ‘Em-Zimbelman45221438328
19ETC-Wyer45201640323
20PL-Wood45181842349
21BC-Bloch 3.5W45162045337
22AYTC-Lov'n D'Aces-Padilla45152146337
23WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-Gai36171946352
24BAIN-Wiggins36142247363
25NTC-Whitman36152149360
26STC-Ancinas26122043307
27RBW-Netchix-Williams26112147326
28BC-Birch/Gerard27142248361
29BETC-Mansfield27122451368
30CAC/SL-Smart Aces-McGoldrick27102656390
31TCSP-Love Hurts-Chow1792351335
32AYTC-Lee1782452340
33STC-Avengers-Anderson1872959389
34BELL-Caldwell 3.5W1882862417
35HBSQ-Vitco/Clark1863062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jamie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.44
Katie Jergens
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Brooke Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.38
Angela Graham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Amy Zimbelman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Lisa Muzzy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Sue Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Cecilia Moens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Janice Merlino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Jolly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Sherri Wolson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Heather Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Chardie Byrne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.81
Donna Lou
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
—
Susie Bunker
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Williams + Amy Zimbelman11–359% games+7.7% vs expected
Janice Merlino + Katie Jergens6–457% games+6.0% vs expected
Jamie Williams + Brooke Gilbert21–857% games+5.7% vs expected
Chardie Byrne + Brooke Gilbert10–755% games+1.6% vs expected
Jamie Williams + Tracy Jolly8–553% games−0.5% vs expected
Katie Jergens + Amy Zimbelman7–451% games−0.8% vs expected
Chardie Byrne + Amy Zimbelman4–848% games−1.5% vs expected
Sherri Wolson + Lisa Muzzy4–649% games−4.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamie Williams
109W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Katie Jergens
138W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.44
4
Brooke Gilbert
129W–102L career · 8 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Angela Graham
105W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Amy Zimbelman
98W–104L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Lisa Muzzy
38W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
—
3.5
Sue Thompson
76W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Cecilia Moens
52W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Janice Merlino
64W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Tracy Jolly
65W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sherri Wolson
87W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Heather Curtis
70W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Chardie Byrne
60W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Donna Lou
57W–52L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
—
Susie Bunker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.