Teams

Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

19 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesRennie Vandermeer vs Channing Burney6-1, 6-1
2025-10-19vs The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5SWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Walker / Rennie Vandermeer vs Allison Leeper / Carlin Mihm6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRebecca Heller / Kelsey Hills vs Kristi Merrill / Christie Rymsza2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Sorrell / Lindsey Wilson vs Karen McLeland / Shelly Gillert6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-12vs Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5SWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Walker / Rennie Vandermeer vs Gerilynn Sanders / Ana Goridkov6-1, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5SLost 03
L#1 SinglesMayada Naami vs Heidi Young0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Hills / Jennifer Calhoun vs Michele Gurley / Amy Williams7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Heller / Natalie Sorrell vs Laurin Shambora / Katherine Dreyer2-6, 1-6
2025-09-28Won 20
W#2 DoublesNatalie Sorrell / Katie Campbell vs Spiwe Dube / Anita Adoba6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Calhoun / Erika Burton vs Yeasil Park / Gemela Lewis6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Heller / Rennie Vandermeer vs Lu Phillips / Cindy Graham6-1, 6-3
2025-09-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Park / Rennie Vandermeer vs Alexis Prochnow / Julie Harner6-1, 6-0
2025-09-07vs High Point/Herling W3.5SWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Calhoun / Kelsey Hills vs Danise McMahon / Jadey Liu6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNatalie Sorrell / Mary Simons vs Linda Dres / Kathy Almond6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Amanda Robertson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Lindsey Hutchinson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.37
Kelsey Hills
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Monica Knake
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Natalie Sorrell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Judy Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Laurie Bracy
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.12
Karla Baumgartner
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.10
Jennifer Calhoun
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Rebecca Heller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Mary Simons
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Elizabeth Dean
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Erika Burton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Libby Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mayada Naami
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Molly Carson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rennie Vandermeer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Tongula Steddum
published
Weezie Margolis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsey Hills + Lindsey Hutchinson7262% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Robertson
21W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Lindsey Hutchinson
26W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Kelsey Hills
17W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Monica Knake
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Natalie Sorrell
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Judy Marlow
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Laurie Bracy
4W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Karla Baumgartner
11W–22L career · 13 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jennifer Calhoun
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Rebecca Heller
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.06
Mary Simons
18W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Elizabeth Dean
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erika Burton
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Libby Johnson
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mayada Naami
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Molly Carson
16W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rennie Vandermeer
8W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tongula Steddum
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Weezie Margolis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.