Teams

Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

22 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-26vs Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5SLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Lesslie / Jackie Nelson vs Heather Williams / Nikki Renwick3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Jacobs / Pamela Sewak vs Kelly Oujezdsky / Brenda Reynolds0-6, 1-6
2025-10-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Jacobs / Jackie Nelson vs Marianne Hark / Julie Sayah1-6, 4-6
2025-10-12vs Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5SWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Stevens / Jackie Nelson vs Aliaksandra Holub Filistovich / Jennifer Stringer5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Parsons / Marci Frenkel vs Tina Hoang / Genevive Gener6-1, 3-1
W#3 DoublesAsheley Wagnon / Blair Ward vs Lorri Vaughn / Deborah Arnold6-2, 6-4
2025-10-05vs High Point/Mallaki W 3.5SLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy White / Jana Chester vs Natalie Gilbert / Kayla Chen4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJackie Nelson / Rebecca Stevens vs Asia Maston / Noelle Ratliff3-6, 3-6
2025-09-28Lost 02
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Parsons / Diana Dildy vs Gretchen Allen / Jacqueline Carson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAsheley Wagnon / Jackie Nelson vs Pamela Ferrell / Rachel Brownlee3-6, 3-6
2025-09-14vs Samuell Grand/Leary W3.5SWon 10
W#3 DoublesBlair Ward / Heather Smercina vs Monica Leary / Melissa Romig6-2, 6-3
2025-09-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJackie Nelson / Asheley Wagnon vs Melissa Feste / Leona Halama5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sonali Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.35
Amy Loehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Jana Chester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Elizabeth Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Marci Frenkel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Blair Ward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Morgan Gulbas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Ann Marie Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Jackie Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.07
Michele Lesslie
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.00
Heather Smercina
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.97
Diana Wohldmann
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.89
Pamela Sewak
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.85
Jessica Kirwan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Maria Goble
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Diana Dildy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Asheley Wagnon
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.74
Dionne Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kim Schmeltz
published
Leslie Atkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Michelle Hrnicek
published
Patricia Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marci Frenkel + Morgan Gulbas4256% games+9.8% vs expected
Heather Smercina + Maria Goble2350% games+9.6% vs expected
Jessica Kirwan + Dionne Flynn4844% games+3.5% vs expected
Heather Smercina + Michele Lesslie2454% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Kirwan + Heather Smercina3253% gamesnot enough data
Ann Marie Bishop + Morgan Gulbas314 matchesnot enough data
Dionne Flynn + Heather Smercina134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Loehr + Diana Wohldmann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonali Agrawal
15W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Amy Loehr
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Jana Chester
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Elizabeth Parsons
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Marci Frenkel
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Blair Ward
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Morgan Gulbas
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Ann Marie Bishop
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Jackie Nelson
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Michele Lesslie
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Heather Smercina
22W–29L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Diana Wohldmann
18W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Pamela Sewak
7W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
Jessica Kirwan
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Maria Goble
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Diana Dildy
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Asheley Wagnon
7W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Dionne Flynn
8W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Kim Schmeltz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Atkins
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Hrnicek
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Jacobs
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.