Teams

Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesAllison Carlson / Christine Fimbres vs Lily Treacy / Lolita Tiu6-1, 6-4
2025-10-05vs LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5SSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Fimbres / Sheri Colaluca vs Deanna Harp / Jennifer Mays0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Carlson / Kit Cohorn vs Julie Ramirez / Melissa Szabo7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Gleneagles/Steyn-PieroniWon 10
W#2 DoublesKit Cohorn / Barbara Thompson vs Tina Hou / Lisa Pieroni6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNgoc Foster / Kit Cohorn vs Tammi Cole / Ruth Robbins4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-14Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Thompson / Christine Fimbres vs Louise Master / Ruth Scribner4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Hansen / Cathy Langland vs Patricia Thoma / Beverly Vucekovich1-6, 4-6
2025-09-07vs Greenhill/Wilder-Mulhern W3.5SLost 02
L#2 DoublesKit Cohorn / Barbara Thompson vs SAMANTHA DEVITO / Cynthia Wilder7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Hansen / Lauren Prager vs Nicole Russell / Macy Wilson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S80211128236
2Greenhill/Chris-Ericson W3.5S7123923250
3The Nelson/Schmitz-Scott W3.5S7124825243
4Greenhill/Wilder-Mulhern W3.5S6123515193
5Jack Coleman TC/Lamarque-Nguyen W3.5S61161228226
6Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S62221023236
7Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S62211127238
8The Lakes TA/Alwood-Silver W3.5S62151737291
9Huffhines/Rodriguez W3.5S52171126247
10Jack Coleman TC/Sisk-Griffin W3.5S53181431284
11Eldorado/Miles-Griffin W3.5S53151736278
12McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S43151329239
13LB Houston/O'Brien W3.5S43141434265
14Oak Creek/Grubstein/Greenstone W3.5S44161635270
15High Point/Mallaki W 3.5S44161635297
16High Point/Herling W3.5S35181433292
17Jack Coleman TC/Slote W3.5S35171535283
18Greenhill/Votava-Cole W3.5S25141432240
19Samuell Grand/Leary W3.5S25101840274
20Stonebridge Ranch/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S26131942303
21Chandlers Landing/Campbell-Miller W3.5S16121634283
22Canyon Creek/Ritz-Carlson W3.5S1691943298
23Brookhaven/Wohldmann W3.5S17102248331
24Prince of Peace/Smith W3.5S1772553355
25Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni0742449312
26Greenhill/Sanders-Madden W3.5S0862654357

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Dawn Ritz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Kit Cohorn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Jennifer Spoons
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.42
Ngoc Foster
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.37
Kelly Britson
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Sheri Colaluca
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.24
Christine Fimbres
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Cathy Langland
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.19
Lauren Prager
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.19
Shelley Duron
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.18
Susan Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Dawn Cotter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ngoc Foster + Kit Cohorn8266% games+14.2% vs expected
Kelly Britson + Sheri Colaluca6752% games+3.6% vs expected
Sheri Colaluca + Shelley Duron6848% games+1.8% vs expected
Ngoc Foster + Kelly Britson404 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Cotter + Jennifer Spoons213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Britson + Shelley Duron213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Langland + Susan Hansen033 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Ritz + Susan Hansen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Ritz
49W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.63
Kit Cohorn
18W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jennifer Spoons
32W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Ngoc Foster
27W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kelly Britson
47W–30L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Sheri Colaluca
17W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Christine Fimbres
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Cathy Langland
13W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Lauren Prager
7W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Shelley Duron
20W–31L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Susan Hansen
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Dawn Cotter
9W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.